PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHF vs. VWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHF vs. VWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHF achieves a 15.39% return, which is significantly higher than VWO's 10.77% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHF has outperformed VWO with an annualized return of 10.82%, while VWO has yielded a comparatively lower 9.00% annualized return.


SCHF

1D
0.29%
1M
1.69%
YTD
15.39%
6M
17.24%
1Y
31.75%
3Y*
19.18%
5Y*
9.76%
10Y*
10.82%

VWO

1D
0.76%
1M
-0.68%
YTD
10.77%
6M
12.57%
1Y
26.52%
3Y*
16.61%
5Y*
5.03%
10Y*
9.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHF vs. VWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
15.39%34.55%3.28%18.35%-14.80%11.40%9.48%22.26%-14.29%26.03%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
10.77%25.60%10.59%9.25%-17.98%1.26%15.17%20.75%-14.76%31.49%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHF and VWO is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009

0.81

The correlation between SCHF and VWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHF vs. VWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHF
VWO

Financial Services

23.3%
19.5%

Industrials

18.1%
8.0%

Technology

17.6%
29.6%

Basic Materials

7.4%
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
10.7%

Healthcare

7.0%
3.9%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
3.7%

Energy

4.7%
4.6%

Communication Services

3.6%
7.1%

Utilities

3.2%
2.9%

Real Estate

2.0%
2.2%

Financial Services

SCHF
23.3%
VWO
19.5%

Industrials

SCHF
18.1%
VWO
8.0%

Technology

SCHF
17.6%
VWO
29.6%

Basic Materials

SCHF
7.4%
VWO
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHF
7.3%
VWO
10.7%

Healthcare

SCHF
7.0%
VWO
3.9%

Consumer Defensive

SCHF
5.7%
VWO
3.7%

Energy

SCHF
4.7%
VWO
4.6%

Communication Services

SCHF
3.6%
VWO
7.1%

Utilities

SCHF
3.2%
VWO
2.9%

Real Estate

SCHF
2.0%
VWO
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHF vs. VWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHF
SCHF Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SCHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHF Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHF Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

VWO
VWO Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
VWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWO Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
VWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHF vs. VWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHFVWODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.28

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

2.21

+0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.14

7.80

+2.34

SCHF vs. VWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHF Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the VWO Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHF and VWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHF vs. VWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHF drawdown since its inception was -34.87%, smaller than the maximum VWO drawdown of -67.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHF and VWO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHFVWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.87%

-67.68%

+32.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.48%

-11.17%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.41%

-17.37%

+3.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.14%

-32.60%

+3.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.87%

-36.39%

+1.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-2.68%

+1.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.37%

-15.80%

+8.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

3.17%

-0.18%

Volatility

SCHF vs. VWO - Volatility Comparison

Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) have volatilities of 6.91% and 6.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHFVWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.91%

6.64%

+0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.42%

14.04%

+0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.67%

16.54%

+0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.56%

17.48%

-0.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.24%

19.22%

-1.98%

SCHF vs. VWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHF has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than VWO's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHF vs. VWO - Dividend Comparison

SCHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, more than VWO's 2.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
2.96%3.42%3.26%2.97%2.80%3.19%2.08%2.95%3.06%2.35%2.58%2.26%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
2.44%2.79%3.20%3.52%4.11%2.63%1.91%3.23%2.88%2.30%2.52%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHF and VWO have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHF has higher volatility (6.91%) compared to VWO (6.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHF dropped -34.87% vs VWO's -67.68%.

On 10-year performance, SCHF leads with 10.82% vs 9.00% for VWO. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VWO has been the lower-risk option at 6.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHF has performed better with a 10.82% return vs 9.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for VWO.

SCHF has the higher dividend yield at 2.96%, compared with 2.44% for VWO.

SCHF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while VWO is Emerging Markets Equities. SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index, while VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHF and 0.08% for VWO.

SCHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHF and VWO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer