PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHF vs. SPEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHF vs. SPEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHF achieves a 15.39% return, which is significantly higher than SPEM's 11.32% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHF has outperformed SPEM with an annualized return of 10.82%, while SPEM has yielded a comparatively lower 9.63% annualized return.


SCHF

1D
0.29%
1M
1.57%
YTD
15.39%
6M
17.24%
1Y
30.20%
3Y*
19.18%
5Y*
9.76%
10Y*
10.82%

SPEM

1D
0.87%
1M
-0.21%
YTD
11.32%
6M
13.11%
1Y
25.79%
3Y*
17.37%
5Y*
5.60%
10Y*
9.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHF vs. SPEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
15.39%34.55%3.28%18.35%-14.80%11.40%9.48%22.26%-14.29%26.03%
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
11.32%25.63%11.40%10.51%-17.90%1.51%14.55%19.69%-13.26%34.82%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHF and SPEM is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009

0.81

The correlation between SCHF and SPEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHF vs. SPEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHF
SPEM

Financial Services

24.0%
20.2%

Technology

21.4%
28.2%

Industrials

8.9%
8.5%

Healthcare

7.3%
4.0%

Basic Materials

5.8%
8.2%

Energy

5.5%
4.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

4.4%
10.4%

Communication Services

1.8%
7.2%

Utilities

1.0%
2.8%

Real Estate

0.2%
1.9%

Financial Services

SCHF
24.0%
SPEM
20.2%

Technology

SCHF
21.4%
SPEM
28.2%

Industrials

SCHF
8.9%
SPEM
8.5%

Healthcare

SCHF
7.3%
SPEM
4.0%

Basic Materials

SCHF
5.8%
SPEM
8.2%

Energy

SCHF
5.5%
SPEM
4.7%

Consumer Defensive

SCHF
4.5%
SPEM
3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHF
4.4%
SPEM
10.4%

Communication Services

SCHF
1.8%
SPEM
7.2%

Utilities

SCHF
1.0%
SPEM
2.8%

Real Estate

SCHF
0.2%
SPEM
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHF vs. SPEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHF
SCHF Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SCHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHF Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHF Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

SPEM
SPEM Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SPEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPEM Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SPEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPEM Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHF vs. SPEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHFSPEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.29

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

2.28

+0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.14

8.16

+1.98

SCHF vs. SPEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHF Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the SPEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHF and SPEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHF vs. SPEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHF drawdown since its inception was -34.87%, smaller than the maximum SPEM drawdown of -64.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHF and SPEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHFSPEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.87%

-64.41%

+29.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.48%

-11.36%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.41%

-17.62%

+4.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.14%

-31.75%

+2.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.87%

-36.06%

+1.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-2.40%

+1.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.37%

-14.73%

+7.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

3.17%

-0.18%

Volatility

SCHF vs. SPEM - Volatility Comparison

Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) have volatilities of 6.91% and 6.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHFSPEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.91%

6.87%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.42%

14.21%

+0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.67%

16.67%

0.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.56%

17.26%

-0.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.24%

18.83%

-1.59%

SCHF vs. SPEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHF has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than SPEM's 0.11% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHF vs. SPEM - Dividend Comparison

SCHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, more than SPEM's 2.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
2.96%3.42%3.26%2.97%2.80%3.19%2.08%2.95%3.06%2.35%2.58%2.26%
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
2.49%2.77%2.78%2.80%3.38%3.14%1.92%2.94%2.34%1.12%1.51%2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHF and SPEM have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHF has higher volatility (6.91%) compared to SPEM (6.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHF dropped -34.87% vs SPEM's -64.41%.

On 10-year performance, SCHF leads with 10.82% vs 9.63% for SPEM. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHF has performed better with a 10.82% return vs 9.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.11% for SPEM.

SCHF has the higher dividend yield at 2.96%, compared with 2.49% for SPEM.

SCHF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while SPEM is Emerging Markets Equities. SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index, while SPEM tracks S&P Emerging Markets BMI. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHF and 0.11% for SPEM.

SCHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHF and SPEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer