PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHF vs. PXF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHF vs. PXF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHF achieves a 15.39% return, which is significantly lower than PXF's 18.79% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHF has underperformed PXF with an annualized return of 10.82%, while PXF has yielded a comparatively higher 12.26% annualized return.


SCHF

1D
0.29%
1M
1.57%
YTD
15.39%
6M
17.24%
1Y
30.20%
3Y*
19.18%
5Y*
9.76%
10Y*
10.82%

PXF

1D
0.34%
1M
0.89%
YTD
18.79%
6M
20.98%
1Y
39.76%
3Y*
23.81%
5Y*
13.18%
10Y*
12.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHF vs. PXF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
15.39%34.55%3.28%18.35%-14.80%11.40%9.48%22.26%-14.29%26.03%
PXF
Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF
18.79%42.51%4.54%18.46%-9.09%15.93%2.58%17.50%-14.84%24.52%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHF and PXF is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009

0.96

The correlation between SCHF and PXF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHF vs. PXF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHF
PXF

Financial Services

24.0%
19.7%

Technology

21.4%
11.4%

Industrials

8.9%
15.1%

Healthcare

7.3%
7.2%

Basic Materials

5.8%
10.1%

Energy

5.5%
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

4.4%
10.2%

Communication Services

1.8%
4.3%

Utilities

1.0%
3.6%

Real Estate

0.2%
1.8%

Financial Services

SCHF
24.0%
PXF
19.7%

Technology

SCHF
21.4%
PXF
11.4%

Industrials

SCHF
8.9%
PXF
15.1%

Healthcare

SCHF
7.3%
PXF
7.2%

Basic Materials

SCHF
5.8%
PXF
10.1%

Energy

SCHF
5.5%
PXF
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

SCHF
4.5%
PXF
6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHF
4.4%
PXF
10.2%

Communication Services

SCHF
1.8%
PXF
4.3%

Utilities

SCHF
1.0%
PXF
3.6%

Real Estate

SCHF
0.2%
PXF
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHF vs. PXF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHF
SCHF Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SCHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHF Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHF Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

PXF
PXF Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
PXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXF Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
PXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXF Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHF vs. PXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHFPXFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.45

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

3.66

-1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.14

13.76

-3.61

SCHF vs. PXF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHF Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the PXF Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHF and PXF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHF vs. PXF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHF drawdown since its inception was -34.87%, smaller than the maximum PXF drawdown of -64.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHF and PXF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHFPXFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.87%

-64.74%

+29.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.48%

-10.91%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.41%

-14.06%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.14%

-26.82%

-2.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.87%

-41.59%

+6.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-2.04%

+1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.37%

-15.25%

+7.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

2.90%

+0.09%

Volatility

SCHF vs. PXF - Volatility Comparison

Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) have volatilities of 6.91% and 6.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHFPXFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.91%

6.76%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.42%

13.95%

+0.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.67%

16.18%

+0.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.56%

16.62%

-0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.24%

18.07%

-0.83%

SCHF vs. PXF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHF has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than PXF's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCHF vs. PXF - Dividend Comparison

SCHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, less than PXF's 3.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PXF
Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF
3.12%3.64%3.48%3.55%3.58%3.74%2.11%3.50%3.38%2.78%3.21%3.10%
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
2.96%3.42%3.26%2.97%2.80%3.19%2.08%2.95%3.06%2.35%2.58%2.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, SCHF and PXF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SCHF has higher volatility (6.91%) compared to PXF (6.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHF dropped -34.87% vs PXF's -64.74%.

On 10-year performance, PXF leads with 12.26% vs 10.82% for SCHF. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, PXF has been the lower-risk option at 6.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PXF has performed better with a 12.26% return vs 10.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for PXF.

PXF has the higher dividend yield at 3.12%, compared with 2.96% for SCHF.

SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index, while PXF tracks FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHF and 0.45% for PXF.

PXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHF and PXF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer