SCHF vs. LEGR
SCHF (Schwab International Equity ETF) and LEGR (First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index, while LEGR is a Blockchain fund tracking the Indxx Blockchain Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SCHF returned 9.76%/yr vs 11.61%/yr for LEGR. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHF charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LEGR.
Performance
SCHF vs. LEGR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHF achieves a 15.39% return, which is significantly higher than LEGR's 11.18% return.
SCHF
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 3.90%
- YTD
- 15.39%
- 6M
- 17.24%
- 1Y
- 31.75%
- 3Y*
- 19.18%
- 5Y*
- 9.76%
- 10Y*
- 10.82%
LEGR
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 4.00%
- YTD
- 11.18%
- 6M
- 13.29%
- 1Y
- 28.16%
- 3Y*
- 22.32%
- 5Y*
- 11.61%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHF vs. LEGR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 15.39% | 34.55% | 3.28% | 18.35% | -14.80% | 11.40% | 9.48% | 22.26% | -19.24% |
LEGR First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF | 11.18% | 30.83% | 16.25% | 22.79% | -19.01% | 17.91% | 18.73% | 27.99% | -14.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHF and LEGR is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2018 | 0.87 |
The correlation between SCHF and LEGR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHF vs. LEGR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHF
LEGR
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
SCHF
LEGR
Industrials
SCHF
LEGR
Technology
SCHF
LEGR
Basic Materials
SCHF
LEGR
Consumer Cyclical
SCHF
LEGR
Healthcare
SCHF
LEGR
Consumer Defensive
SCHF
LEGR
Energy
SCHF
LEGR
Communication Services
SCHF
LEGR
Utilities
SCHF
LEGR
Real Estate
SCHF
LEGR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHF vs. LEGR — Risk / Return Rank
SCHF
LEGR
SCHF vs. LEGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHF | LEGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.34 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 2.64 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.14 | 9.72 | +0.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHF vs. LEGR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHF drawdown since its inception was -34.87%, roughly equal to the maximum LEGR drawdown of -36.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHF and LEGR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHF | LEGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.87% | -36.12% | +1.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.48% | -10.40% | -1.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.41% | -14.25% | +0.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.14% | -31.45% | +2.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.00% | -2.56% | +1.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.37% | -6.60% | -0.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.99% | 2.82% | +0.17% |
Volatility
SCHF vs. LEGR - Volatility Comparison
Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a higher volatility of 6.91% compared to First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR) at 5.87%. This indicates that SCHF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LEGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHF | LEGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.91% | 5.87% | +1.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.42% | 12.07% | +2.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.67% | 14.34% | +2.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.56% | 17.07% | -0.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.24% | 20.33% | -3.09% |
SCHF vs. LEGR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHF has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than LEGR's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHF vs. LEGR - Dividend Comparison
SCHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, more than LEGR's 1.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEGR First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF | 1.68% | 1.84% | 2.40% | 2.56% | 2.64% | 1.80% | 0.95% | 2.04% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 2.96% | 3.42% | 3.26% | 2.97% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 2.08% | 2.95% | 3.06% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 2.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHF and LEGR have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHF has higher volatility (6.91%) compared to LEGR (5.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHF dropped -34.87% vs LEGR's -36.12%.
On 5-year performance, LEGR leads with 11.61% vs 9.76% for SCHF. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, LEGR has been the lower-risk option at 5.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LEGR has performed better with a 11.61% return vs 9.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LEGR.
SCHF has the higher dividend yield at 2.96%, compared with 1.68% for LEGR.
SCHF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while LEGR is Blockchain. SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index, while LEGR tracks Indxx Blockchain Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHF and 0.65% for LEGR.
LEGR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHF and LEGR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer