PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHF vs. FIVA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHF vs. FIVA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHF achieves a 15.34% return, which is significantly lower than FIVA's 17.54% return.


SCHF

1D
0.47%
1M
0.33%
6M
8.27%
YTD
15.34%
1Y
31.49%
3Y*
19.29%
5Y*
9.97%
10Y*
10.16%
ALL TIME*
7.86%

FIVA

1D
0.97%
1M
2.60%
6M
9.51%
YTD
17.54%
1Y
39.96%
3Y*
22.78%
5Y*
14.04%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.99M$3.02M$3.13M
$217.84M$219.61M$214.32M

SCHF vs. FIVA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
15.34%34.55%3.28%18.35%-14.80%11.40%9.48%22.26%-18.18%
FIVA
Fidelity International Value Factor ETF
17.54%45.83%2.53%20.38%-10.37%15.90%-1.78%19.78%-18.62%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHF and FIVA is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2018

0.92

The correlation between SCHF and FIVA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHF vs. FIVA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHF
FIVA

Financial Services

25.6%
26.1%

Technology

16.4%
15.8%

Industrials

14.3%
17.9%

Healthcare

7.1%
8.3%

Basic Materials

6.7%
7.1%

Consumer Cyclical

6.3%
6.9%

Energy

5.3%
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
5.4%

Utilities

3.2%
3.4%

Communication Services

2.4%
2.8%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.6%

Financial Services

SCHF
25.6%
FIVA
26.1%

Technology

SCHF
16.4%
FIVA
15.8%

Industrials

SCHF
14.3%
FIVA
17.9%

Healthcare

SCHF
7.1%
FIVA
8.3%

Basic Materials

SCHF
6.7%
FIVA
7.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHF
6.3%
FIVA
6.9%

Energy

SCHF
5.3%
FIVA
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

SCHF
5.1%
FIVA
5.4%

Utilities

SCHF
3.2%
FIVA
3.4%

Communication Services

SCHF
2.4%
FIVA
2.8%

Real Estate

SCHF
1.9%
FIVA
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHF vs. FIVA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SCHF
SCHF Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
SCHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHF Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHF Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

FIVA
FIVA Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FIVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIVA Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FIVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIVA Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SCHF vs. FIVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHFFIVADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.44

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

3.43

-0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.23

13.58

-3.35

SCHF vs. FIVA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHF Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the FIVA Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHF and FIVA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHF vs. FIVA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHF drawdown since its inception was -34.87%, smaller than the maximum FIVA drawdown of -39.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHF and FIVA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHFFIVADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.87%

-39.76%

+4.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.48%

-11.71%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.41%

-14.77%

+1.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.14%

-28.70%

-0.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.99%

0.00%

-1.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.33%

-7.65%

+0.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

2.95%

+0.14%

Volatility

SCHF vs. FIVA - Volatility Comparison

Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a higher volatility of 5.37% compared to Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) at 4.41%. This indicates that SCHF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHFFIVADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.37%

4.41%

+0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.41%

13.76%

+1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.38%

16.02%

+1.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.70%

16.46%

+0.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.06%

17.91%

-0.85%

SCHF vs. FIVA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHF has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than FIVA's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHF vs. FIVA - Dividend Comparison

SCHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, more than FIVA's 2.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIVA
Fidelity International Value Factor ETF
2.57%2.68%3.52%3.63%3.62%3.76%2.46%3.61%3.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
3.06%3.42%3.26%2.97%2.80%3.19%2.08%2.95%3.06%2.35%2.58%2.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, SCHF and FIVA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SCHF has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to FIVA (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHF dropped -34.87% vs FIVA's -39.76%.

On 5-year performance, FIVA leads with 14.04% vs 9.97% for SCHF. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, FIVA has been the lower-risk option at 4.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FIVA has performed better with a 14.04% return vs 9.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for FIVA.

SCHF has the higher dividend yield at 3.06%, compared with 2.57% for FIVA.

SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index, while FIVA tracks Fidelity International Value Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHF and 0.18% for FIVA.

FIVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHF and FIVA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer