SCHF vs. EWJ
SCHF (Schwab International Equity ETF) and EWJ (iShares MSCI Japan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index, while EWJ is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHF returned 10.82%/yr vs 9.55%/yr for EWJ. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHF charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EWJ.
Performance
SCHF vs. EWJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SCHF having a 15.39% return and EWJ slightly lower at 14.83%. Over the past 10 years, SCHF has outperformed EWJ with an annualized return of 10.82%, while EWJ has yielded a comparatively lower 9.55% annualized return.
SCHF
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 3.90%
- YTD
- 15.39%
- 6M
- 17.24%
- 1Y
- 31.75%
- 3Y*
- 19.18%
- 5Y*
- 9.76%
- 10Y*
- 10.82%
EWJ
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 1.80%
- YTD
- 14.83%
- 6M
- 14.50%
- 1Y
- 31.74%
- 3Y*
- 16.57%
- 5Y*
- 8.56%
- 10Y*
- 9.55%
SCHF vs. EWJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 15.39% | 34.55% | 3.28% | 18.35% | -14.80% | 11.40% | 9.48% | 22.26% | -14.29% | 26.03% |
EWJ iShares MSCI Japan ETF | 14.83% | 25.84% | 7.03% | 20.29% | -17.72% | 1.16% | 15.40% | 19.34% | -14.10% | 24.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHF and EWJ is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009 | 0.80 |
The correlation between SCHF and EWJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHF vs. EWJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHF
EWJ
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
SCHF
EWJ
Industrials
SCHF
EWJ
Technology
SCHF
EWJ
Basic Materials
SCHF
EWJ
Consumer Cyclical
SCHF
EWJ
Healthcare
SCHF
EWJ
Consumer Defensive
SCHF
EWJ
Energy
SCHF
EWJ
Communication Services
SCHF
EWJ
Utilities
SCHF
EWJ
Real Estate
SCHF
EWJ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHF vs. EWJ — Risk / Return Rank
SCHF
EWJ
SCHF vs. EWJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHF | EWJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.28 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 2.27 | +0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.14 | 7.62 | +2.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHF vs. EWJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHF drawdown since its inception was -34.87%, smaller than the maximum EWJ drawdown of -60.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHF and EWJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHF | EWJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.87% | -60.93% | +26.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.48% | -13.59% | +2.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.41% | -14.68% | +1.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.14% | -33.14% | +4.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.87% | -33.14% | -1.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.00% | -1.51% | +0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.37% | -21.72% | +14.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.99% | 4.04% | -1.05% |
Volatility
SCHF vs. EWJ - Volatility Comparison
Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a higher volatility of 6.91% compared to iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ) at 6.31%. This indicates that SCHF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHF | EWJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.91% | 6.31% | +0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.42% | 15.96% | -1.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.67% | 20.23% | -3.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.56% | 18.38% | -1.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.24% | 17.33% | -0.09% |
SCHF vs. EWJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHF has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than EWJ's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHF vs. EWJ - Dividend Comparison
SCHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, less than EWJ's 3.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWJ iShares MSCI Japan ETF | 3.94% | 4.52% | 2.34% | 2.03% | 1.23% | 2.08% | 1.04% | 2.03% | 1.71% | 1.25% | 1.95% | 1.27% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 2.96% | 3.42% | 3.26% | 2.97% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 2.08% | 2.95% | 3.06% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 2.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHF and EWJ have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHF has higher volatility (6.91%) compared to EWJ (6.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHF dropped -34.87% vs EWJ's -60.93%.
On 10-year performance, SCHF leads with 10.82% vs 9.55% for EWJ. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, EWJ has been the lower-risk option at 6.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHF has performed better with a 10.82% return vs 9.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EWJ.
EWJ has the higher dividend yield at 3.94%, compared with 2.96% for SCHF.
SCHF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while EWJ is Japan Equities. SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index, while EWJ tracks MSCI Japan Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHF and 0.49% for EWJ.
SCHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHF and EWJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer