SCHF vs. ARCC
SCHF (Schwab International Equity ETF) is Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index, while ARCC (Ares Capital Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SCHF returned 10.82%/yr vs 13.20%/yr for ARCC. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
SCHF vs. ARCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHF achieves a 15.39% return, which is significantly higher than ARCC's -2.20% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHF has underperformed ARCC with an annualized return of 10.82%, while ARCC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.20% annualized return.
SCHF
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- YTD
- 15.39%
- 6M
- 17.24%
- 1Y
- 31.75%
- 3Y*
- 19.18%
- 5Y*
- 9.76%
- 10Y*
- 10.82%
ARCC
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- YTD
- -2.20%
- 6M
- -2.87%
- 1Y
- -3.87%
- 3Y*
- 10.27%
- 5Y*
- 9.04%
- 10Y*
- 13.20%
SCHF vs. ARCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 15.39% | 34.55% | 3.28% | 18.35% | -14.80% | 11.40% | 9.48% | 22.26% | -14.29% | 26.03% |
ARCC Ares Capital Corporation | -2.20% | 1.07% | 19.78% | 20.03% | -3.84% | 36.14% | 0.86% | 31.30% | 8.81% | 4.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHF and ARCC is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009 | 0.51 |
The correlation between SCHF and ARCC shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHF vs. ARCC — Risk / Return Rank
SCHF
ARCC
SCHF vs. ARCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHF | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 0.97 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | -0.26 | +2.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.14 | -0.47 | +10.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHF vs. ARCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHF drawdown since its inception was -34.87%, smaller than the maximum ARCC drawdown of -79.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHF and ARCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHF | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.87% | -79.36% | +44.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.48% | -19.35% | +7.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.41% | -19.35% | +5.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.14% | -21.76% | -7.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.87% | -56.77% | +21.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.00% | -10.98% | +9.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.37% | -9.10% | +1.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.99% | 10.68% | -7.69% |
Volatility
SCHF vs. ARCC - Volatility Comparison
Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a higher volatility of 6.91% compared to Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) at 3.72%. This indicates that SCHF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHF | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.91% | 3.72% | +3.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.42% | 14.83% | -0.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.67% | 18.48% | -1.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.56% | 19.96% | -3.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.24% | 25.58% | -8.34% |
Dividends
SCHF vs. ARCC - Dividend Comparison
SCHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, less than ARCC's 9.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARCC Ares Capital Corporation | 7.48% | 9.49% | 8.77% | 9.59% | 10.12% | 7.65% | 9.47% | 9.01% | 9.88% | 9.67% | 9.22% | 11.02% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 2.96% | 3.42% | 3.26% | 2.97% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 2.08% | 2.95% | 3.06% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 2.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHF and ARCC have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHF has higher volatility (6.91%) compared to ARCC (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHF dropped -34.87% vs ARCC's -79.36%.
SCHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHF and ARCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer