SCHD vs. XSVM
SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) and XSVM (Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while XSVM is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 High Momentum Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHD returned 12.91%/yr vs 13.23%/yr for XSVM. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCHD charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.37%/yr for XSVM.
Performance
SCHD vs. XSVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHD achieves a 20.66% return, which is significantly lower than XSVM's 21.88% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SCHD having a 12.91% annualized return and XSVM not far ahead at 13.23%.
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 3.21%
- YTD
- 20.66%
- 6M
- 19.57%
- 1Y
- 26.72%
- 3Y*
- 14.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.75%
- 10Y*
- 12.91%
XSVM
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- 5.46%
- YTD
- 21.88%
- 6M
- 18.48%
- 1Y
- 42.01%
- 3Y*
- 16.38%
- 5Y*
- 7.44%
- 10Y*
- 13.23%
SCHD vs. XSVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 20.66% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF | 21.88% | 7.47% | 2.30% | 20.20% | -13.63% | 56.36% | 5.08% | 30.01% | -12.33% | 3.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHD and XSVM is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011 | 0.74 |
The correlation between SCHD and XSVM shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SCHD vs. XSVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHD
XSVM
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Technology
Energy
Financial Services
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
SCHD
XSVM
Healthcare
SCHD
XSVM
Technology
SCHD
XSVM
Energy
SCHD
XSVM
Financial Services
SCHD
XSVM
Industrials
SCHD
XSVM
Communication Services
SCHD
XSVM
Consumer Cyclical
SCHD
XSVM
Basic Materials
SCHD
XSVM
Utilities
SCHD
XSVM
Real Estate
SCHD
-
XSVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHD vs. XSVM — Risk / Return Rank
SCHD
XSVM
SCHD vs. XSVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHD | XSVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.37 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.70 | 3.86 | +1.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.97 | 11.98 | +1.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHD vs. XSVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHD drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, smaller than the maximum XSVM drawdown of -62.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHD and XSVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHD | XSVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.37% | -62.57% | +29.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.61% | -10.08% | +5.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.13% | -26.21% | +10.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.85% | -26.21% | +9.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.37% | -49.02% | +15.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.03% | 0.00% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.31% | -11.55% | +8.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 3.26% | -1.37% |
Volatility
SCHD vs. XSVM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is 3.05%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) has a volatility of 5.09%. This indicates that SCHD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHD | XSVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.05% | 5.09% | -2.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.53% | 12.03% | -4.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.93% | 18.60% | -7.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.38% | 22.61% | -8.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 25.08% | -8.36% |
SCHD vs. XSVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHD has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than XSVM's 0.37% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHD vs. XSVM - Dividend Comparison
SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, more than XSVM's 1.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.22% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF | 1.74% | 2.29% | 1.69% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.23% | 1.21% | 1.22% | 2.54% | 1.90% | 2.29% | 2.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHD and XSVM have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XSVM has higher volatility (5.09%) compared to SCHD (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHD dropped -33.37% vs XSVM's -62.57%.
On 10-year performance, XSVM leads with 13.23% vs 12.91% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XSVM has performed better with a 13.23% return vs 12.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for XSVM.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 1.74% for XSVM.
SCHD is categorized as Dividend, while XSVM is Momentum. SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while XSVM tracks S&P SmallCap 600 High Momentum Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHD and 0.37% for XSVM.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHD and XSVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer