SCHD vs. UHS
SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) is Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while UHS (Universal Health Services, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SCHD returned 12.91%/yr vs 1.37%/yr for UHS. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SCHD vs. UHS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHD achieves a 20.66% return, which is significantly higher than UHS's -32.68% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHD has outperformed UHS with an annualized return of 12.91%, while UHS has yielded a comparatively lower 1.37% annualized return.
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 3.37%
- YTD
- 20.66%
- 6M
- 19.57%
- 1Y
- 26.16%
- 3Y*
- 14.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.75%
- 10Y*
- 12.91%
UHS
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -14.26%
- YTD
- -32.68%
- 6M
- -34.07%
- 1Y
- -15.32%
- 3Y*
- 1.73%
- 5Y*
- -1.29%
- 10Y*
- 1.37%
SCHD vs. UHS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 20.66% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
UHS Universal Health Services, Inc. | -32.68% | 22.02% | 18.19% | 8.83% | 9.37% | -5.16% | -4.00% | 23.62% | 3.16% | 6.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHD and UHS is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011 | 0.49 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SCHD and UHS has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHD vs. UHS — Risk / Return Rank
SCHD
UHS
SCHD vs. UHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHD | UHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 0.93 | +0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.70 | -0.37 | +6.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.97 | -0.89 | +14.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHD vs. UHS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHD drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, smaller than the maximum UHS drawdown of -60.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHD and UHS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHD | UHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.37% | -60.27% | +26.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.61% | -41.52% | +36.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.13% | -41.52% | +25.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.85% | -44.90% | +28.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.37% | -56.30% | +22.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.03% | -39.85% | +39.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.31% | -14.82% | +11.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 17.33% | -15.44% |
Volatility
SCHD vs. UHS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is 3.05%, while Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) has a volatility of 7.25%. This indicates that SCHD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHD | UHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.05% | 7.25% | -4.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.53% | 25.18% | -17.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.93% | 31.46% | -20.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.38% | 31.82% | -17.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 34.37% | -17.65% |
Dividends
SCHD vs. UHS - Dividend Comparison
SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, more than UHS's 0.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.22% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
UHS Universal Health Services, Inc. | 0.55% | 0.37% | 0.45% | 0.52% | 0.57% | 0.62% | 0.15% | 0.42% | 0.34% | 0.35% | 0.38% | 0.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHD and UHS have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UHS has higher volatility (7.25%) compared to SCHD (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHD dropped -33.37% vs UHS's -60.27%.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHD and UHS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer