PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHD vs. SLYV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHD vs. SLYV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHD achieves a 23.36% return, which is significantly higher than SLYV's 20.28% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHD has outperformed SLYV with an annualized return of 12.52%, while SLYV has yielded a comparatively lower 10.08% annualized return.


SCHD

1D
1.49%
1M
4.16%
6M
16.12%
YTD
23.36%
1Y
26.33%
3Y*
13.98%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*
12.52%
ALL TIME*
13.37%

SLYV

1D
0.18%
1M
0.18%
6M
12.38%
YTD
20.28%
1Y
32.51%
3Y*
12.94%
5Y*
8.27%
10Y*
10.08%
ALL TIME*
10.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$653.58M$651.34M$657.10M
$13.68M$20.85M$23.13M

SCHD vs. SLYV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
23.36%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
20.28%6.54%7.28%14.82%-11.08%30.57%2.68%24.26%-12.77%11.74%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHD and SLYV is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011

0.78

The correlation between SCHD and SLYV shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SCHD vs. SLYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHD
SLYV

Healthcare

20.8%
6.4%

Consumer Defensive

20.6%
5.1%

Energy

14.1%
7.7%

Technology

12.7%
11.8%

Financial Services

9.9%
21.4%

Industrials

7.8%
13.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%
14.9%

Communication Services

6.2%
3.5%

Basic Materials

1.2%
5.6%

Utilities

0.1%
2.1%

Real Estate

-

7.9%

Healthcare

SCHD
20.8%
SLYV
6.4%

Consumer Defensive

SCHD
20.6%
SLYV
5.1%

Energy

SCHD
14.1%
SLYV
7.7%

Technology

SCHD
12.7%
SLYV
11.8%

Financial Services

SCHD
9.9%
SLYV
21.4%

Industrials

SCHD
7.8%
SLYV
13.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHD
7.7%
SLYV
14.9%

Communication Services

SCHD
6.2%
SLYV
3.5%

Basic Materials

SCHD
1.2%
SLYV
5.6%

Utilities

SCHD
0.1%
SLYV
2.1%

Real Estate

SCHD

-

SLYV
7.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHD vs. SLYV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

SLYV
SLYV Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
SLYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLYV Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SLYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLYV Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHD vs. SLYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHDSLYVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.33

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.77

3.57

+2.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.17

12.10

+2.07

SCHD vs. SLYV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHD Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the SLYV Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHD and SLYV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHD vs. SLYV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHD drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, smaller than the maximum SLYV drawdown of -61.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHD and SLYV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHDSLYVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.37%

-61.15%

+27.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.61%

-9.36%

+4.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.13%

-28.68%

+12.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.85%

-28.68%

+11.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.37%

-47.73%

+14.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.61%

+1.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.30%

-8.90%

+5.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

2.76%

-0.88%

Volatility

SCHD vs. SLYV - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a higher volatility of 3.85% compared to SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) at 3.61%. This indicates that SCHD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHDSLYVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.85%

3.61%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.91%

11.21%

-3.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.07%

17.81%

-6.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.37%

21.70%

-7.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.71%

23.89%

-7.18%

SCHD vs. SLYV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHD has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than SLYV's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHD vs. SLYV - Dividend Comparison

SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, more than SLYV's 1.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.15%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
1.82%2.02%2.30%2.11%1.47%1.94%1.40%1.67%2.14%5.53%2.18%6.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHD and SLYV have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHD has higher volatility (3.85%) compared to SLYV (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHD dropped -33.37% vs SLYV's -61.15%.

On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.52% vs 10.08% for SLYV. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SLYV has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.52% return vs 10.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SLYV.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.15%, compared with 1.82% for SLYV.

SCHD is categorized as Dividend, while SLYV is Small Cap Value Equities. SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while SLYV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHD and 0.15% for SLYV.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHD and SLYV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer