SCHD vs. SDOG
SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) and SDOG (ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while SDOG is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S-Network Sector Dividend Dogs Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHD returned 12.91%/yr vs 9.99%/yr for SDOG. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHD charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for SDOG.
Performance
SCHD vs. SDOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHD achieves a 20.66% return, which is significantly higher than SDOG's 17.13% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHD has outperformed SDOG with an annualized return of 12.91%, while SDOG has yielded a comparatively lower 9.99% annualized return.
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 3.21%
- YTD
- 20.66%
- 6M
- 19.57%
- 1Y
- 26.72%
- 3Y*
- 14.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.75%
- 10Y*
- 12.91%
SDOG
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 5.43%
- YTD
- 17.13%
- 6M
- 16.28%
- 1Y
- 27.16%
- 3Y*
- 16.38%
- 5Y*
- 9.08%
- 10Y*
- 9.99%
SCHD vs. SDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 20.66% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
SDOG ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 17.13% | 11.12% | 14.70% | 4.19% | -0.20% | 24.59% | -0.35% | 24.02% | -11.43% | 12.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHD and SDOG is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2012 | 0.90 |
The correlation between SCHD and SDOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHD vs. SDOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHD
SDOG
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Energy
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
SCHD
SDOG
Consumer Defensive
SCHD
SDOG
Healthcare
SCHD
SDOG
Energy
SCHD
SDOG
Financial Services
SCHD
SDOG
Industrials
SCHD
SDOG
Consumer Cyclical
SCHD
SDOG
Communication Services
SCHD
SDOG
Basic Materials
SCHD
SDOG
Utilities
SCHD
SDOG
Real Estate
SCHD
-
SDOG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHD vs. SDOG — Risk / Return Rank
SCHD
SDOG
SCHD vs. SDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHD | SDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.40 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.70 | 4.25 | +1.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.97 | 13.63 | +0.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHD vs. SDOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHD drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, smaller than the maximum SDOG drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHD and SDOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHD | SDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.37% | -43.56% | +10.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.61% | -6.24% | +1.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.13% | -16.00% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.85% | -19.84% | +2.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.37% | -43.56% | +10.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.03% | 0.00% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.31% | -4.91% | +1.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 1.94% | -0.05% |
Volatility
SCHD vs. SDOG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is 3.05%, while ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) has a volatility of 3.34%. This indicates that SCHD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SDOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHD | SDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.05% | 3.34% | -0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.53% | 8.02% | -0.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.93% | 11.52% | -0.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.38% | 15.44% | -1.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 19.06% | -2.34% |
SCHD vs. SDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHD has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than SDOG's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHD vs. SDOG - Dividend Comparison
SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, less than SDOG's 3.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.22% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
SDOG ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 3.26% | 3.68% | 3.86% | 4.29% | 3.87% | 3.62% | 3.63% | 3.37% | 4.03% | 3.27% | 3.32% | 3.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHD and SDOG have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SDOG has higher volatility (3.34%) compared to SCHD (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHD dropped -33.37% vs SDOG's -43.56%.
On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.91% vs 9.99% for SDOG. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.91% return vs 9.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for SDOG.
SDOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 3.22% for SCHD.
SCHD is categorized as Dividend, while SDOG is Large Cap Value Equities. SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while SDOG tracks S-Network Sector Dividend Dogs Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHD and 0.36% for SDOG.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHD and SDOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer