SCHD vs. PFFD
SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) and PFFD (Global X U.S. Preferred ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while PFFD is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofAML Diversified Core U.S. Preferred Securities Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SCHD returned 8.75%/yr vs -0.25%/yr for PFFD. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCHD charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for PFFD.
Performance
SCHD vs. PFFD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHD achieves a 20.66% return, which is significantly higher than PFFD's 2.18% return.
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 3.37%
- YTD
- 20.66%
- 6M
- 19.57%
- 1Y
- 26.16%
- 3Y*
- 14.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.75%
- 10Y*
- 12.91%
PFFD
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- YTD
- 2.18%
- 6M
- 2.18%
- 1Y
- 7.19%
- 3Y*
- 5.67%
- 5Y*
- -0.25%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHD vs. PFFD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 20.66% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 11.56% |
PFFD Global X U.S. Preferred ETF | 2.18% | 3.22% | 7.07% | 6.85% | -20.20% | 5.07% | 8.90% | 17.43% | -3.94% | 0.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHD and PFFD is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2017 | 0.45 |
The correlation between SCHD and PFFD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHD vs. PFFD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHD
PFFD
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
Technology
Energy
-
Financial Services
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
SCHD
PFFD
-
Healthcare
SCHD
PFFD
Technology
SCHD
PFFD
Energy
SCHD
PFFD
-
Financial Services
SCHD
PFFD
Industrials
SCHD
PFFD
Communication Services
SCHD
PFFD
Consumer Cyclical
SCHD
PFFD
Basic Materials
SCHD
PFFD
Utilities
SCHD
PFFD
Real Estate
SCHD
-
PFFD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHD vs. PFFD — Risk / Return Rank
SCHD
PFFD
SCHD vs. PFFD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and Global X U.S. Preferred ETF (PFFD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHD | PFFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.17 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.70 | 1.21 | +4.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.97 | 3.55 | +10.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHD vs. PFFD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHD drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, which is greater than PFFD's maximum drawdown of -30.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHD and PFFD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHD | PFFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.37% | -30.93% | -2.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.61% | -5.97% | +1.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.13% | -10.84% | -5.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.85% | -24.45% | +7.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.03% | -3.78% | +3.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.31% | -6.58% | +3.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 2.03% | -0.14% |
Volatility
SCHD vs. PFFD - Volatility Comparison
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a higher volatility of 3.05% compared to Global X U.S. Preferred ETF (PFFD) at 2.15%. This indicates that SCHD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFFD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHD | PFFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.05% | 2.15% | +0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.53% | 5.40% | +2.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.93% | 7.29% | +3.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.38% | 10.99% | +3.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 12.74% | +3.98% |
SCHD vs. PFFD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHD has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than PFFD's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHD vs. PFFD - Dividend Comparison
SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, less than PFFD's 6.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFFD Global X U.S. Preferred ETF | 6.38% | 6.37% | 6.42% | 6.49% | 6.63% | 5.09% | 5.17% | 5.48% | 6.21% | 1.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.22% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHD and PFFD have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHD has higher volatility (3.05%) compared to PFFD (2.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHD dropped -33.37% vs PFFD's -30.93%.
On 5-year performance, SCHD leads with 8.75% vs -0.25% for PFFD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, PFFD has been the lower-risk option at 2.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 8.75% return vs -0.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for PFFD.
PFFD has the higher dividend yield at 6.38%, compared with 3.22% for SCHD.
SCHD is categorized as Dividend, while PFFD is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds. SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while PFFD tracks ICE BofAML Diversified Core U.S. Preferred Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHD and 0.23% for PFFD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHD and PFFD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer