PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHD vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHD vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHD achieves a 19.01% return, which is significantly higher than FDL's 13.33% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHD has outperformed FDL with an annualized return of 12.77%, while FDL has yielded a comparatively lower 11.24% annualized return.


SCHD

1D
0.00%
1M
2.70%
YTD
19.01%
6M
18.63%
1Y
27.16%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
8.36%
10Y*
12.77%

FDL

1D
-0.26%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
13.33%
6M
14.76%
1Y
23.67%
3Y*
18.97%
5Y*
12.51%
10Y*
11.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHD vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
19.01%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
13.33%14.79%17.98%2.94%6.66%26.10%-4.30%24.41%-5.99%12.02%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHD and FDL is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011

0.90

The correlation between SCHD and FDL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHD vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHD
FDL

Consumer Defensive

19.2%
14.7%

Healthcare

18.8%
16.8%

Technology

16.4%
1.1%

Energy

16.2%
27.3%

Financial Services

9.3%
15.1%

Industrials

7.5%
3.8%

Communication Services

6.3%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.3%
3.8%

Basic Materials

1.2%
0.3%

Utilities

0.0%
6.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Consumer Defensive

SCHD
19.2%
FDL
14.7%

Healthcare

SCHD
18.8%
FDL
16.8%

Technology

SCHD
16.4%
FDL
1.1%

Energy

SCHD
16.2%
FDL
27.3%

Financial Services

SCHD
9.3%
FDL
15.1%

Industrials

SCHD
7.5%
FDL
3.8%

Communication Services

SCHD
6.3%
FDL
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHD
6.3%
FDL
3.8%

Basic Materials

SCHD
1.2%
FDL
0.3%

Utilities

SCHD
0.0%
FDL
6.5%

Real Estate

SCHD

-

FDL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHD vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHD vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHDFDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.37

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.91

5.56

+0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.53

13.56

+0.97

SCHD vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHD Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHD and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHDFDLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

2.11

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.88

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.66

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.45

+0.41

Drawdowns

SCHD vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHD drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHD and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHDFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.37%

-65.93%

+32.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.61%

-4.27%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.13%

-12.24%

-3.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.85%

-16.46%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.37%

-41.40%

+8.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.40%

-2.18%

+0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.32%

-9.66%

+6.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

1.75%

+0.13%

Volatility

SCHD vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is 2.66%, while First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) has a volatility of 2.85%. This indicates that SCHD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHDFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

2.85%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.66%

7.87%

-0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.96%

11.28%

-0.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.38%

14.31%

+0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.72%

17.11%

-0.39%

SCHD vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHD has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than FDL's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCHD vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, less than FDL's 3.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.68%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.26%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, SCHD and FDL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FDL has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to SCHD (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHD dropped -33.37% vs FDL's -65.93%.

On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.77% vs 11.24% for FDL. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.77% return vs 11.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FDL.

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 3.26% for SCHD.

SCHD is categorized as Dividend, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHD and 0.45% for FDL.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHD and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer