SCHC vs. TBUX
SCHC (Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF) and TBUX (T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHC is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Custom Developed Small Cap ex-US Liquid Net of Tax (Lux), while TBUX is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. SCHC is passively managed, while TBUX is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SCHC returned 16.78%/yr vs 5.85%/yr for TBUX. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCHC charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for TBUX.
Performance
SCHC vs. TBUX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHC achieves a 6.81% return, which is significantly higher than TBUX's 1.69% return.
SCHC
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -5.20%
- YTD
- 6.81%
- 6M
- 9.38%
- 1Y
- 23.23%
- 3Y*
- 16.78%
- 5Y*
- 5.72%
- 10Y*
- 7.91%
TBUX
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.69%
- 6M
- 2.08%
- 1Y
- 4.88%
- 3Y*
- 5.85%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHC vs. TBUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF | 6.81% | 37.59% | 1.97% | 14.36% | -21.74% | 1.19% |
TBUX T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF | 1.69% | 5.37% | 6.38% | 6.39% | -0.13% | -0.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHC and TBUX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2021 | 0.18 |
SCHC vs. TBUX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHC
TBUX
Industrials
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Industrials
SCHC
TBUX
Basic Materials
SCHC
TBUX
Financial Services
SCHC
TBUX
Consumer Cyclical
SCHC
TBUX
Technology
SCHC
TBUX
Real Estate
SCHC
TBUX
Energy
SCHC
TBUX
Healthcare
SCHC
TBUX
Consumer Defensive
SCHC
TBUX
Communication Services
SCHC
TBUX
Utilities
SCHC
TBUX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHC vs. TBUX — Risk / Return Rank
SCHC
TBUX
SCHC vs. TBUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) and T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (TBUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHC | TBUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -12.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 3.15 | -1.88 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | 48.80 | -46.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.03 | 185.24 | -178.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHC | TBUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47 | 7.27 | -5.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 3.88 | -3.50 |
Drawdowns
SCHC vs. TBUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHC drawdown since its inception was -43.94%, which is greater than TBUX's maximum drawdown of -1.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHC and TBUX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHC | TBUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.94% | -1.79% | -42.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.48% | -0.10% | -12.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.52% | -0.33% | -15.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.65% | -0.04% | -5.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.05% | -0.28% | -9.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.31% | 0.03% | +3.28% |
Volatility
SCHC vs. TBUX - Volatility Comparison
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) has a higher volatility of 5.47% compared to T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (TBUX) at 0.22%. This indicates that SCHC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TBUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHC | TBUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.47% | 0.22% | +5.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.49% | 0.46% | +13.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.86% | 0.67% | +15.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.56% | 1.07% | +16.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.02% | 1.07% | +16.95% |
SCHC vs. TBUX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHC has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than TBUX's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHC vs. TBUX - Dividend Comparison
SCHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, less than TBUX's 4.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF | 3.43% | 3.66% | 3.72% | 2.94% | 1.78% | 3.02% | 1.62% | 3.23% | 2.51% | 2.73% | 2.01% | 2.34% |
TBUX T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF | 4.48% | 4.67% | 5.39% | 4.66% | 2.58% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHC and TBUX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHC has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to TBUX (0.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHC dropped -43.94% vs TBUX's -1.79%.
On 3-year performance, SCHC leads with 16.78% vs 5.85% for TBUX. On fees, SCHC is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, TBUX has been the lower-risk option at 0.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SCHC has performed better with a 16.78% return vs 5.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHC is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for TBUX.
TBUX has the higher dividend yield at 4.48%, compared with 3.43% for SCHC.
SCHC is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while TBUX is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for SCHC and 0.17% for TBUX.
TBUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.27 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHC and TBUX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer