SCHC vs. IDGT
SCHC (Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF) and IDGT (iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHC is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed Small Cap ex U.S. Liquid Index, while IDGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Data Center, Tower REIT and Communications Equipment Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHC returned 8.68%/yr vs 14.61%/yr for IDGT. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCHC charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for IDGT.
Performance
SCHC vs. IDGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHC achieves a 8.19% return, which is significantly lower than IDGT's 48.60% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHC has underperformed IDGT with an annualized return of 8.68%, while IDGT has yielded a comparatively higher 14.61% annualized return.
SCHC
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -1.97%
- YTD
- 8.19%
- 6M
- 8.34%
- 1Y
- 24.95%
- 3Y*
- 18.14%
- 5Y*
- 6.51%
- 10Y*
- 8.68%
IDGT
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- YTD
- 48.60%
- 6M
- 47.03%
- 1Y
- 58.23%
- 3Y*
- 24.83%
- 5Y*
- 12.59%
- 10Y*
- 14.61%
SCHC vs. IDGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF | 8.19% | 37.59% | 1.97% | 14.36% | -21.74% | 12.02% | 10.48% | 23.10% | -18.60% | 29.42% |
IDGT iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF | 48.60% | 6.79% | 26.71% | -6.09% | -17.90% | 42.14% | 8.78% | 17.39% | -1.97% | 11.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHC and IDGT is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2010 | 0.64 |
The correlation between SCHC and IDGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHC vs. IDGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHC
IDGT
Industrials
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
Real Estate
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
Industrials
SCHC
IDGT
-
Financial Services
SCHC
IDGT
-
Basic Materials
SCHC
IDGT
-
Consumer Cyclical
SCHC
IDGT
-
Technology
SCHC
IDGT
Real Estate
SCHC
IDGT
Energy
SCHC
IDGT
-
Healthcare
SCHC
IDGT
-
Consumer Defensive
SCHC
IDGT
-
Utilities
SCHC
IDGT
-
Communication Services
SCHC
IDGT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHC vs. IDGT — Risk / Return Rank
SCHC
IDGT
SCHC vs. IDGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) and iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHC | IDGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.46 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.01 | 6.49 | -4.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.33 | 18.73 | -11.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHC vs. IDGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHC drawdown since its inception was -43.94%, smaller than the maximum IDGT drawdown of -77.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHC and IDGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHC | IDGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.94% | -77.95% | +34.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.48% | -9.02% | -3.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.52% | -23.74% | +8.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.48% | -35.83% | -0.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.94% | -36.88% | -7.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.42% | -4.96% | +0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.04% | -19.88% | +9.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.41% | 3.12% | +0.29% |
Volatility
SCHC vs. IDGT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) is 5.84%, while iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) has a volatility of 9.03%. This indicates that SCHC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHC | IDGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.84% | 9.03% | -3.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.93% | 17.48% | -3.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.20% | 21.36% | -5.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.61% | 23.34% | -5.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.00% | 23.38% | -5.38% |
SCHC vs. IDGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHC has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than IDGT's 0.41% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHC vs. IDGT - Dividend Comparison
SCHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, more than IDGT's 0.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDGT iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF | 0.72% | 1.17% | 1.64% | 0.37% | 0.30% | 0.28% | 0.60% | 0.42% | 0.65% | 0.57% | 0.75% | 0.72% |
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF | 3.38% | 3.66% | 3.72% | 2.94% | 1.78% | 3.02% | 1.62% | 3.23% | 2.51% | 2.73% | 2.01% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHC and IDGT have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IDGT has higher volatility (9.03%) compared to SCHC (5.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHC dropped -43.94% vs IDGT's -77.95%.
On 10-year performance, IDGT leads with 14.61% vs 8.68% for SCHC. On fees, SCHC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, SCHC has been the lower-risk option at 5.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IDGT has performed better with a 14.61% return vs 8.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for IDGT.
SCHC has the higher dividend yield at 3.38%, compared with 0.72% for IDGT.
SCHC is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while IDGT is Technology Equities. SCHC tracks FTSE Developed Small Cap ex U.S. Liquid Index, while IDGT tracks S&P Data Center, Tower REIT and Communications Equipment Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for SCHC and 0.41% for IDGT.
IDGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHC and IDGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer