PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHC vs. FNDE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHC vs. FNDE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) and Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF (FNDE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHC achieves a 9.25% return, which is significantly lower than FNDE's 13.70% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHC has underperformed FNDE with an annualized return of 8.48%, while FNDE has yielded a comparatively higher 11.35% annualized return.


SCHC

1D
0.71%
1M
-2.18%
YTD
9.25%
6M
11.25%
1Y
23.99%
3Y*
17.06%
5Y*
6.10%
10Y*
8.48%

FNDE

1D
0.66%
1M
-0.85%
YTD
13.70%
6M
15.79%
1Y
29.82%
3Y*
19.78%
5Y*
9.29%
10Y*
11.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHC vs. FNDE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHC
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF
9.25%37.59%1.97%14.36%-21.74%12.02%10.48%23.10%-18.60%29.42%
FNDE
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF
13.70%29.46%12.10%14.99%-15.58%14.41%-2.77%19.75%-10.37%26.77%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHC and FNDE is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013

0.76

The correlation between SCHC and FNDE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHC vs. FNDE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHC
FNDE

Industrials

22.4%
4.7%

Basic Materials

13.7%
13.6%

Financial Services

12.6%
23.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
9.5%

Technology

9.2%
18.7%

Real Estate

8.6%
1.5%

Energy

6.5%
15.5%

Healthcare

6.5%
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.1%
3.1%

Communication Services

3.2%
6.6%

Utilities

3.2%
2.5%

Industrials

SCHC
22.4%
FNDE
4.7%

Basic Materials

SCHC
13.7%
FNDE
13.6%

Financial Services

SCHC
12.6%
FNDE
23.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHC
10.0%
FNDE
9.5%

Technology

SCHC
9.2%
FNDE
18.7%

Real Estate

SCHC
8.6%
FNDE
1.5%

Energy

SCHC
6.5%
FNDE
15.5%

Healthcare

SCHC
6.5%
FNDE
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

SCHC
4.1%
FNDE
3.1%

Communication Services

SCHC
3.2%
FNDE
6.6%

Utilities

SCHC
3.2%
FNDE
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHC vs. FNDE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHC
SCHC Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SCHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHC Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHC Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

FNDE
FNDE Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FNDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDE Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDE Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHC vs. FNDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) and Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF (FNDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHCFNDEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.35

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

2.93

-1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.12

10.67

-3.55

SCHC vs. FNDE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHC Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the FNDE Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHC and FNDE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHC vs. FNDE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHC drawdown since its inception was -43.94%, roughly equal to the maximum FNDE drawdown of -43.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHC and FNDE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHCFNDEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.94%

-43.55%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.48%

-10.23%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.52%

-18.40%

+2.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.48%

-29.44%

-7.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.94%

-39.93%

-4.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.49%

-3.19%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.04%

-11.69%

+1.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.38%

2.80%

+0.58%

Volatility

SCHC vs. FNDE - Volatility Comparison

Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) and Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF (FNDE) have volatilities of 6.31% and 6.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHCFNDEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.31%

6.30%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.88%

13.07%

+0.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.21%

15.61%

+0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.62%

17.01%

+0.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.02%

19.30%

-1.28%

SCHC vs. FNDE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHC has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDE's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCHC vs. FNDE - Dividend Comparison

SCHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, less than FNDE's 3.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDE
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF
3.68%4.19%4.82%4.74%5.59%4.32%2.50%3.47%2.98%2.05%1.65%2.02%
SCHC
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF
3.35%3.66%3.72%2.94%1.78%3.02%1.62%3.23%2.51%2.73%2.01%2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHC and FNDE have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHC has higher volatility (6.31%) compared to FNDE (6.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHC dropped -43.94% vs FNDE's -43.55%.

On 10-year performance, FNDE leads with 11.35% vs 8.48% for SCHC. On fees, SCHC is cheaper at 0.11% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FNDE has performed better with a 11.35% return vs 8.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHC is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FNDE.

FNDE has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 3.35% for SCHC.

SCHC is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while FNDE is Emerging Markets Equities. SCHC tracks FTSE Custom Developed Small Cap ex-US Liquid Net of Tax (Lux), while FNDE tracks Russell Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for SCHC and 0.39% for FNDE.

FNDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHC and FNDE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer