PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHB vs. SPTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHB vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SCHB having a 10.58% return and SPTM slightly higher at 10.61%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SCHB having a 14.63% annualized return and SPTM not far ahead at 14.86%.


SCHB

1D
0.59%
1M
-0.21%
6M
8.84%
YTD
10.58%
1Y
19.74%
3Y*
18.96%
5Y*
11.79%
10Y*
14.63%
ALL TIME*
14.17%

SPTM

1D
0.62%
1M
0.11%
6M
8.81%
YTD
10.61%
1Y
19.97%
3Y*
18.90%
5Y*
12.48%
10Y*
14.86%
ALL TIME*
8.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$212.56M$205.35M$255.93M
$40.04M$39.69M$45.49M

SCHB vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
10.58%16.94%23.93%26.16%-19.46%25.84%20.76%30.79%-5.43%21.20%
SPTM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF
10.61%16.93%23.87%25.55%-17.75%28.58%17.94%31.34%-5.30%21.18%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHB and SPTM is 1.00 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009

0.95

The correlation between SCHB and SPTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHB vs. SPTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHB
SPTM

Technology

35.8%
36.0%

Financial Services

11.9%
12.5%

Industrials

9.8%
9.1%

Healthcare

9.6%
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
9.5%

Communication Services

9.2%
9.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
4.6%

Energy

3.2%
3.4%

Real Estate

2.4%
2.3%

Utilities

2.2%
2.2%

Basic Materials

1.9%
2.0%

Technology

SCHB
35.8%
SPTM
36.0%

Financial Services

SCHB
11.9%
SPTM
12.5%

Industrials

SCHB
9.8%
SPTM
9.1%

Healthcare

SCHB
9.6%
SPTM
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHB
9.6%
SPTM
9.5%

Communication Services

SCHB
9.2%
SPTM
9.2%

Consumer Defensive

SCHB
4.4%
SPTM
4.6%

Energy

SCHB
3.2%
SPTM
3.4%

Real Estate

SCHB
2.4%
SPTM
2.3%

Utilities

SCHB
2.2%
SPTM
2.2%

Basic Materials

SCHB
1.9%
SPTM
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHB vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SCHB
SCHB Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SCHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHB Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHB Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

SPTM
SPTM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPTM Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SPTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPTM Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SCHB vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHBSPTMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.28

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

2.31

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.54

10.07

-0.54

SCHB vs. SPTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHB Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the SPTM Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHB and SPTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHB vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHB drawdown since its inception was -35.27%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHB and SPTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHBSPTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.27%

-54.80%

+19.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.91%

-8.68%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.34%

-18.87%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.41%

-24.14%

-1.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.27%

-34.66%

-0.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.34%

-1.11%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.09%

-9.00%

+4.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

1.99%

+0.09%

Volatility

SCHB vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) have volatilities of 3.48% and 3.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHBSPTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.48%

3.50%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.28%

10.02%

+0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.12%

12.81%

+0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.36%

16.97%

+0.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.32%

18.03%

+0.29%

SCHB vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SCHB and SPTM have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHB vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison

SCHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than SPTM's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
1.04%1.11%1.24%1.40%1.61%1.21%1.63%1.80%2.00%1.65%1.86%2.00%
SPTM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF
1.06%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.56%1.72%1.90%1.66%1.91%1.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, SCHB and SPTM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPTM has higher volatility (3.50%) compared to SCHB (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHB dropped -35.27% vs SPTM's -54.80%.

On 10-year performance, SPTM leads with 14.86% vs 14.63% for SCHB. Both ETFs have the same 0.03% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPTM has performed better with a 14.86% return vs 14.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHB and SPTM have the same expense ratio: 0.03% per year.

SPTM has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 1.04% for SCHB.

SCHB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index, while SPTM tracks S&P Composite 1500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and State Street.

SPTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHB and SPTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer