SCHB vs. GXLC
SCHB (Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF) and GXLC (Global X U.S. 500 ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - SCHB tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index while GXLC tracks the Solactive GBS United States 500 Index. Both are passively managed. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SCHB charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for GXLC.
Performance
SCHB vs. GXLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHB achieves a 8.93% return, which is significantly higher than GXLC's 7.92% return.
SCHB
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -1.50%
- YTD
- 8.93%
- 6M
- 7.50%
- 1Y
- 22.90%
- 3Y*
- 20.79%
- 5Y*
- 11.90%
- 10Y*
- 15.36%
GXLC
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -2.12%
- YTD
- 7.92%
- 6M
- 6.66%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHB vs. GXLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | 8.93% | 2.64% |
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF | 7.92% | 3.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHB and GXLC is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.99 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHB vs. GXLC — Risk / Return Rank
SCHB
GXLC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SCHB vs. GXLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHB | GXLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.35 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHB vs. GXLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHB drawdown since its inception was -35.27%, which is greater than GXLC's maximum drawdown of -9.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHB and GXLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHB | GXLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.27% | -9.08% | -26.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.81% | -3.40% | +0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.11% | -1.56% | -2.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.02% | — | — |
Volatility
SCHB vs. GXLC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHB | GXLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.92% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.04% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.76% | 13.78% | -1.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.35% | 13.78% | +3.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.33% | 13.78% | +4.55% |
SCHB vs. GXLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHB has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is higher than GXLC's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHB vs. GXLC - Dividend Comparison
SCHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, more than GXLC's 0.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF | 0.65% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | 1.06% | 1.11% | 1.24% | 1.40% | 1.61% | 1.21% | 1.63% | 1.80% | 2.00% | 1.65% | 1.86% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, SCHB and GXLC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.03% for SCHB.
SCHB has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 0.65% for GXLC.
SCHB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index, while GXLC tracks Solactive GBS United States 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHB and 0.02% for GXLC.
Find the right allocation for SCHB and GXLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer