PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHA vs. VSS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHA vs. VSS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) and Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHA achieves a 17.78% return, which is significantly higher than VSS's 7.74% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHA has outperformed VSS with an annualized return of 10.95%, while VSS has yielded a comparatively lower 7.98% annualized return.


SCHA

1D
0.93%
1M
0.12%
YTD
17.78%
6M
16.92%
1Y
36.31%
3Y*
17.52%
5Y*
6.45%
10Y*
10.95%

VSS

1D
0.02%
1M
-4.88%
YTD
7.74%
6M
10.30%
1Y
22.83%
3Y*
15.44%
5Y*
5.25%
10Y*
7.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHA vs. VSS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
17.78%11.60%11.16%18.46%-19.81%16.45%19.34%26.50%-11.79%14.94%
VSS
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF
7.74%29.61%2.94%15.52%-21.48%13.05%11.81%21.36%-18.48%30.61%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHA and VSS is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2009

0.76

The correlation between SCHA and VSS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHA vs. VSS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHA
VSS

Technology

23.9%
13.3%

Industrials

15.6%
18.7%

Financial Services

15.3%
10.8%

Healthcare

13.2%
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
9.3%

Real Estate

5.9%
7.3%

Energy

5.4%
4.9%

Basic Materials

4.4%
12.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.5%
3.4%

Utilities

2.3%
2.5%

Communication Services

2.3%
2.3%

Technology

SCHA
23.9%
VSS
13.3%

Industrials

SCHA
15.6%
VSS
18.7%

Financial Services

SCHA
15.3%
VSS
10.8%

Healthcare

SCHA
13.2%
VSS
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHA
9.0%
VSS
9.3%

Real Estate

SCHA
5.9%
VSS
7.3%

Energy

SCHA
5.4%
VSS
4.9%

Basic Materials

SCHA
4.4%
VSS
12.1%

Consumer Defensive

SCHA
2.5%
VSS
3.4%

Utilities

SCHA
2.3%
VSS
2.5%

Communication Services

SCHA
2.3%
VSS
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHA vs. VSS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHA
SCHA Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SCHA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHA Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHA Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

VSS
VSS Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
VSS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSS Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
VSS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSS Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHA vs. VSS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) and Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHAVSSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.28

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.84

1.97

+1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.05

7.54

+6.51

SCHA vs. VSS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHA Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is higher than the VSS Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHA and VSS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHAVSSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00

1.50

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.32

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.46

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.54

+0.03

Drawdowns

SCHA vs. VSS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHA drawdown since its inception was -42.41%, roughly equal to the maximum VSS drawdown of -43.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHA and VSS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHAVSSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.41%

-43.51%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.50%

-11.62%

+2.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.29%

-15.73%

-11.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.79%

-33.93%

+3.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.41%

-43.51%

+1.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.50%

-5.08%

+2.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.58%

-9.64%

+2.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

3.04%

-0.45%

Volatility

SCHA vs. VSS - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) and Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) have volatilities of 5.79% and 5.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHAVSSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.79%

5.87%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.28%

13.18%

+0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.31%

15.28%

+3.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.98%

16.53%

+5.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.74%

17.30%

+5.44%

SCHA vs. VSS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHA has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than VSS's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHA vs. VSS - Dividend Comparison

SCHA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than VSS's 3.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
1.02%1.26%1.51%1.42%1.37%1.19%1.05%1.39%1.58%1.24%1.50%1.48%
VSS
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF
3.15%3.39%3.44%3.14%2.30%2.74%1.90%3.25%2.80%2.83%2.93%2.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHA and VSS have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VSS has higher volatility (5.87%) compared to SCHA (5.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHA dropped -42.41% vs VSS's -43.51%.

On 10-year performance, SCHA leads with 10.95% vs 7.98% for VSS. On fees, SCHA is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHA has performed better with a 10.95% return vs 7.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHA is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for VSS.

VSS has the higher dividend yield at 3.15%, compared with 1.02% for SCHA.

SCHA is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while VSS is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. SCHA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index, while VSS tracks FTSE Global Small Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHA and 0.07% for VSS.

SCHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHA and VSS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer