PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHA vs. SPEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHA vs. SPEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) and SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHA achieves a 22.49% return, which is significantly higher than SPEM's 11.32% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHA has outperformed SPEM with an annualized return of 11.55%, while SPEM has yielded a comparatively lower 9.63% annualized return.


SCHA

1D
1.16%
1M
5.29%
YTD
22.49%
6M
19.84%
1Y
41.48%
3Y*
18.37%
5Y*
7.19%
10Y*
11.55%

SPEM

1D
0.87%
1M
-0.21%
YTD
11.32%
6M
13.11%
1Y
25.79%
3Y*
17.37%
5Y*
5.60%
10Y*
9.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHA vs. SPEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
22.49%11.60%11.16%18.46%-19.81%16.45%19.34%26.50%-11.79%14.94%
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
11.32%25.63%11.40%10.51%-17.90%1.51%14.55%19.69%-13.26%34.82%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHA and SPEM is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009

0.67

The correlation between SCHA and SPEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHA vs. SPEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHA
SPEM

Technology

23.9%
28.2%

Industrials

15.6%
8.5%

Financial Services

15.3%
20.2%

Healthcare

13.2%
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
10.4%

Real Estate

5.9%
1.9%

Energy

5.4%
4.7%

Basic Materials

4.4%
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.5%
3.9%

Utilities

2.3%
2.8%

Communication Services

2.3%
7.2%

Technology

SCHA
23.9%
SPEM
28.2%

Industrials

SCHA
15.6%
SPEM
8.5%

Financial Services

SCHA
15.3%
SPEM
20.2%

Healthcare

SCHA
13.2%
SPEM
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHA
9.0%
SPEM
10.4%

Real Estate

SCHA
5.9%
SPEM
1.9%

Energy

SCHA
5.4%
SPEM
4.7%

Basic Materials

SCHA
4.4%
SPEM
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

SCHA
2.5%
SPEM
3.9%

Utilities

SCHA
2.3%
SPEM
2.8%

Communication Services

SCHA
2.3%
SPEM
7.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHA vs. SPEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHA
SCHA Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
SCHA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHA Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHA Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

SPEM
SPEM Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SPEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPEM Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SPEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPEM Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHA vs. SPEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) and SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHASPEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.29

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.38

2.28

+2.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.08

8.16

+7.92

SCHA vs. SPEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHA Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is higher than the SPEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHA and SPEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHA vs. SPEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHA drawdown since its inception was -42.41%, smaller than the maximum SPEM drawdown of -64.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHA and SPEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHASPEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.41%

-64.41%

+22.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.50%

-11.36%

+1.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.29%

-17.62%

-9.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.79%

-31.75%

+0.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.41%

-36.06%

-6.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.40%

+2.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.57%

-14.73%

+7.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

3.17%

-0.58%

Volatility

SCHA vs. SPEM - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) and SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) have volatilities of 6.62% and 6.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHASPEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.62%

6.87%

-0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.67%

14.21%

-0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.62%

16.67%

+1.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.03%

17.26%

+4.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.75%

18.83%

+3.92%

SCHA vs. SPEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHA has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SPEM's 0.11% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHA vs. SPEM - Dividend Comparison

SCHA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than SPEM's 2.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
0.98%1.26%1.51%1.42%1.37%1.19%1.05%1.39%1.58%1.24%1.50%1.48%
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
2.49%2.77%2.78%2.80%3.38%3.14%1.92%2.94%2.34%1.12%1.51%2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHA and SPEM have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPEM has higher volatility (6.87%) compared to SCHA (6.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHA dropped -42.41% vs SPEM's -64.41%.

On 10-year performance, SCHA leads with 11.55% vs 9.63% for SPEM. On fees, SCHA is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHA has been the lower-risk option at 6.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHA has performed better with a 11.55% return vs 9.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHA is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.11% for SPEM.

SPEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 0.98% for SCHA.

SCHA is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while SPEM is Emerging Markets Equities. SCHA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index, while SPEM tracks S&P Emerging Markets BMI. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHA and 0.11% for SPEM.

SCHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHA and SPEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer