SCHA vs. FNDX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SCHA (Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF) and FNDX (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHA is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Total Return Index, while FNDX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHA returned 11.13%/yr vs 14.26%/yr for FNDX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHA charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDX.

Performance

SCHA vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHA achieves a 19.79% return, which is significantly higher than FNDX's 14.57% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHA has underperformed FNDX with an annualized return of 11.13%, while FNDX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.26% annualized return.

SCHA

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: 4.77%
• YTD: 19.79%
• 6M: 19.32%
• 1Y: 40.27%
• 3Y*: 18.92%
• 5Y*: 7.13%
• 10Y*: 11.13%

FNDX

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 3.88%
• YTD: 14.57%
• 6M: 14.58%
• 1Y: 32.32%
• 3Y*: 20.90%
• 5Y*: 12.82%
• 10Y*: 14.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHA vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF	19.79%	11.60%	11.16%	18.46%	-19.81%	16.45%	19.34%	26.50%	-11.79%	14.94%
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF	14.57%	16.94%	16.77%	18.23%	-6.92%	31.73%	9.12%	28.65%	-7.30%	17.12%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHA and FNDX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2013	0.87

The correlation between SCHA and FNDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHA vs. FNDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SCHA	FNDX
Technology	23.3%	19.1%
Financial Services	15.7%	14.1%
Industrials	15.4%	9.3%
Healthcare	13.5%	12.0%
Consumer Cyclical	9.0%	9.2%
Real Estate	6.0%	1.8%
Energy	5.5%	10.3%
Basic Materials	4.2%	3.7%
Consumer Defensive	2.6%	7.4%
Communication Services	2.4%	10.1%
Utilities	2.3%	3.2%

Return for Risk

SCHA vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHA

SCHA Risk / Return Rank: 71
SCHA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
SCHA Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
SCHA Omega Ratio Rank: 60
SCHA Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
SCHA Martin Ratio Rank: 79

FNDX

FNDX Risk / Return Rank: 90
FNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
FNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
FNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHA vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCHA	FNDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.25	3.18	-0.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.16	4.47	-1.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.59	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.26	5.35	-1.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.66	20.97	-5.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCHA vs. FNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHA Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the FNDX Sharpe Ratio of 3.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHA and FNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCHA	FNDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.25	3.18	-0.93
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33	0.85	-0.52
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	0.82	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	0.79	-0.22

Drawdowns

SCHA vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHA drawdown since its inception was -42.41%, which is greater than FNDX's maximum drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHA and FNDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCHA	FNDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.41%	-37.72%	-4.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.50%	-6.06%	-3.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.29%	-16.30%	-10.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.79%	-19.06%	-11.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.41%	-37.72%	-4.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.58%	-0.13%	-0.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.58%	-3.55%	-4.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.58%	1.55%	+1.03%

Volatility

SCHA vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) has a higher volatility of 5.08% compared to Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) at 2.25%. This indicates that SCHA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCHA	FNDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.08%	2.25%	+2.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.83%	7.25%	+5.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.01%	10.22%	+7.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.93%	15.18%	+6.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.71%	17.50%	+5.21%

SCHA vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHA has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SCHA vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison

SCHA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than FNDX's 1.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF	1.45%	1.63%	1.76%	1.82%	2.07%	1.64%	2.29%	2.23%	2.40%	1.86%	2.01%	2.01%
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF	1.00%	1.26%	1.51%	1.42%	1.37%	1.19%	1.05%	1.39%	1.58%	1.24%	1.50%	1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCHA and FNDX in my portfolio?

SCHA and FNDX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCHA or FNDX?

SCHA has higher volatility (5.08%) compared to FNDX (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHA dropped -42.41% vs FNDX's -37.72%.

Which ETF is better, SCHA or FNDX?

On 10-year performance, FNDX leads with 14.26% vs 11.13% for SCHA. On fees, SCHA is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, FNDX has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCHA or FNDX?

Over the 10-year period, FNDX has performed better with a 14.26% return vs 11.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCHA or FNDX?

SCHA is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCHA or FNDX?

FNDX has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 1.00% for SCHA.

What is the main difference between SCHA and FNDX?

SCHA is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while FNDX is Large Cap Value Equities. SCHA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Total Return Index, while FNDX tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHA and 0.25% for FNDX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.