SCHA vs. BBUS
SCHA (Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF) and BBUS (JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHA is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Total Return Index, while BBUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SCHA returned 7.13%/yr vs 13.43%/yr for BBUS. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHA charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for BBUS.
Performance
SCHA vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHA achieves a 19.79% return, which is significantly higher than BBUS's 10.60% return.
SCHA
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 4.77%
- YTD
- 19.79%
- 6M
- 19.32%
- 1Y
- 40.27%
- 3Y*
- 18.92%
- 5Y*
- 7.13%
- 10Y*
- 11.13%
BBUS
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- 10.60%
- 6M
- 10.47%
- 1Y
- 27.47%
- 3Y*
- 22.46%
- 5Y*
- 13.43%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHA vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 19.79% | 11.60% | 11.16% | 18.46% | -19.81% | 16.45% | 19.34% | 8.67% |
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 10.60% | 17.77% | 24.89% | 27.20% | -19.46% | 27.13% | 20.69% | 16.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHA and BBUS is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2019 | 0.84 |
The correlation between SCHA and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHA vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHA
BBUS
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Technology
SCHA
BBUS
Financial Services
SCHA
BBUS
Industrials
SCHA
BBUS
Healthcare
SCHA
BBUS
Consumer Cyclical
SCHA
BBUS
Real Estate
SCHA
BBUS
Energy
SCHA
BBUS
Basic Materials
SCHA
BBUS
Consumer Defensive
SCHA
BBUS
Communication Services
SCHA
BBUS
Utilities
SCHA
BBUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHA vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank
SCHA
BBUS
SCHA vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHA | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.25 | 2.33 | -0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.16 | 3.18 | -0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.42 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.26 | 3.00 | +1.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.66 | 13.76 | +1.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHA | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25 | 2.33 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.79 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.84 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
SCHA vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHA drawdown since its inception was -42.41%, which is greater than BBUS's maximum drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHA and BBUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHA | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.41% | -35.35% | -7.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.50% | -9.21% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.29% | -19.01% | -8.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.79% | -25.46% | -5.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -0.74% | +0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.58% | -5.46% | -2.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 2.00% | +0.58% |
Volatility
SCHA vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) has a higher volatility of 5.08% compared to JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 2.88%. This indicates that SCHA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHA | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.08% | 2.88% | +2.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.83% | 8.96% | +3.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.01% | 11.87% | +6.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.93% | 17.03% | +4.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.71% | 19.59% | +3.12% |
SCHA vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHA has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHA vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison
SCHA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, more than BBUS's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.11% | 1.43% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 1.00% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.42% | 1.37% | 1.19% | 1.05% | 1.39% | 1.58% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHA and BBUS have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHA has higher volatility (5.08%) compared to BBUS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHA dropped -42.41% vs BBUS's -35.35%.
On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 13.43% vs 7.13% for SCHA. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 13.43% return vs 7.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for SCHA.
SCHA has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.98% for BBUS.
SCHA is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while BBUS is Large Cap Growth Equities. SCHA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Total Return Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHA and 0.02% for BBUS.
BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHA and BBUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer