PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHA vs. BBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHA vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHA achieves a 19.79% return, which is significantly higher than BBUS's 10.60% return.


SCHA

1D
-0.58%
1M
4.77%
YTD
19.79%
6M
19.32%
1Y
40.27%
3Y*
18.92%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
11.13%

BBUS

1D
-0.74%
1M
5.12%
YTD
10.60%
6M
10.47%
1Y
27.47%
3Y*
22.46%
5Y*
13.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHA vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
19.79%11.60%11.16%18.46%-19.81%16.45%19.34%8.67%
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
10.60%17.77%24.89%27.20%-19.46%27.13%20.69%16.53%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHA and BBUS is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2019

0.84

The correlation between SCHA and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHA vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHA
BBUS

Technology

23.3%
37.1%

Financial Services

15.7%
10.8%

Industrials

15.4%
7.2%

Healthcare

13.5%
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
9.4%

Real Estate

6.0%
1.7%

Energy

5.5%
3.2%

Basic Materials

4.2%
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
4.5%

Communication Services

2.4%
10.8%

Utilities

2.3%
2.6%

Technology

SCHA
23.3%
BBUS
37.1%

Financial Services

SCHA
15.7%
BBUS
10.8%

Industrials

SCHA
15.4%
BBUS
7.2%

Healthcare

SCHA
13.5%
BBUS
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHA
9.0%
BBUS
9.4%

Real Estate

SCHA
6.0%
BBUS
1.7%

Energy

SCHA
5.5%
BBUS
3.2%

Basic Materials

SCHA
4.2%
BBUS
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

SCHA
2.6%
BBUS
4.5%

Communication Services

SCHA
2.4%
BBUS
10.8%

Utilities

SCHA
2.3%
BBUS
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHA vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHA
SCHA Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SCHA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHA Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHA vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHABBUSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.25

2.33

-0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.16

3.18

-0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.42

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.26

3.00

+1.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.66

13.76

+1.90

SCHA vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHA Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHA and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHABBUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

2.33

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.79

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.84

-0.26

Drawdowns

SCHA vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHA drawdown since its inception was -42.41%, which is greater than BBUS's maximum drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHA and BBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHABBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.41%

-35.35%

-7.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.50%

-9.21%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.29%

-19.01%

-8.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.79%

-25.46%

-5.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-0.74%

+0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.58%

-5.46%

-2.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

2.00%

+0.58%

Volatility

SCHA vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) has a higher volatility of 5.08% compared to JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 2.88%. This indicates that SCHA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHABBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.08%

2.88%

+2.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.83%

8.96%

+3.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.01%

11.87%

+6.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.93%

17.03%

+4.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.71%

19.59%

+3.12%

SCHA vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHA has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHA vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

SCHA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, more than BBUS's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
1.00%1.26%1.51%1.42%1.37%1.19%1.05%1.39%1.58%1.24%1.50%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHA and BBUS have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHA has higher volatility (5.08%) compared to BBUS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHA dropped -42.41% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 13.43% vs 7.13% for SCHA. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 13.43% return vs 7.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for SCHA.

SCHA has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.98% for BBUS.

SCHA is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while BBUS is Large Cap Growth Equities. SCHA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Total Return Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHA and 0.02% for BBUS.

BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHA and BBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer