SCCR vs. FCOR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SCCR (Schwab Core Bond ETF) and FCOR (Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCCR is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Charles Schwab, while FCOR is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SCCR returned 6.10% vs 6.06% for FCOR. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCCR charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for FCOR.

Performance

SCCR vs. FCOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Core Bond ETF (SCCR) and Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF (FCOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCCR achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly lower than FCOR's 0.48% return.

SCCR

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 0.39%
• YTD: 0.32%
• 6M: 0.35%
• 1Y: 6.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FCOR

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 0.67%
• YTD: 0.48%
• 6M: 0.32%
• 1Y: 6.06%
• 3Y*: 5.65%
• 5Y*: 0.70%
• 10Y*: 2.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCCR vs. FCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SCCR Schwab Core Bond ETF	0.32%	6.66%
FCOR Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF	0.48%	6.56%

Correlation

The correlation between SCCR and FCOR is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2025	0.85

The correlation between SCCR and FCOR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SCCR vs. FCOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCCR

SCCR Risk / Return Rank: 45
SCCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
SCCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
SCCR Omega Ratio Rank: 45
SCCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
SCCR Martin Ratio Rank: 41

FCOR

FCOR Risk / Return Rank: 38
FCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
FCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
FCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 37
FCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
FCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCCR vs. FCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Core Bond ETF (SCCR) and Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF (FCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCCR	FCOR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	1.39	+0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.46	2.02	+0.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.24	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.18	1.99	+0.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.58	6.21	+0.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCCR vs. FCOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCCR Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the FCOR Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCCR and FCOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCCR	FCOR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.63	1.39	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.10	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.41	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.20	0.43	+0.78

Drawdowns

SCCR vs. FCOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCCR drawdown since its inception was -2.81%, smaller than the maximum FCOR drawdown of -22.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCCR and FCOR.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCCR	FCOR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.81%	-22.60%	+19.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.81%	-3.06%	+0.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-6.60%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.60%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-22.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.56%	-1.18%	-0.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.76%	-4.73%	+3.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.93%	0.98%	-0.05%

Volatility

SCCR vs. FCOR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Core Bond ETF (SCCR) is 1.28%, while Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF (FCOR) has a volatility of 1.61%. This indicates that SCCR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCCR	FCOR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.28%	1.61%	-0.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.70%	3.32%	-0.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.75%	4.38%	-0.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.38%	7.06%	-2.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.38%	7.10%	-2.72%

SCCR vs. FCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCCR has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than FCOR's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCCR vs. FCOR - Dividend Comparison

SCCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, more than FCOR's 4.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCOR Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF	4.55%	4.47%	4.35%	3.70%	3.30%	2.34%	2.99%	3.10%	3.65%	2.81%	3.04%	3.82%
SCCR Schwab Core Bond ETF	4.63%	3.91%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCCR and FCOR in my portfolio?

SCCR and FCOR have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCCR or FCOR?

FCOR has higher volatility (1.61%) compared to SCCR (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCCR dropped -2.81% vs FCOR's -22.60%.

Which ETF is better, SCCR or FCOR?

On 1-year performance, SCCR leads with 6.10% vs 6.06% for FCOR. On fees, SCCR is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, SCCR has been the lower-risk option at 1.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCCR or FCOR?

Over the 1-year period, SCCR has performed better with a 6.10% return vs 6.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCCR or FCOR?

SCCR is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for FCOR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCCR or FCOR?

SCCR has the higher dividend yield at 4.63%, compared with 4.55% for FCOR.

What is the main difference between SCCR and FCOR?

SCCR is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while FCOR is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for SCCR and 0.36% for FCOR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.