FCOR vs. FBNDX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FCOR (Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF) and FBNDX (Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund) are both funds - FCOR is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FBNDX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FCOR returned 2.89%/yr vs 2.12%/yr for FBNDX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FCOR charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FBNDX.

Performance

FCOR vs. FBNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF (FCOR) and Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund (FBNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCOR achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly higher than FBNDX's 0.34% return. Over the past 10 years, FCOR has outperformed FBNDX with an annualized return of 2.89%, while FBNDX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.12% annualized return.

FCOR

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 0.67%
• YTD: 0.48%
• 6M: 0.32%
• 1Y: 6.06%
• 3Y*: 5.65%
• 5Y*: 0.70%
• 10Y*: 2.89%

FBNDX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.47%
• YTD: 0.34%
• 6M: 0.16%
• 1Y: 5.13%
• 3Y*: 4.08%
• 5Y*: 0.20%
• 10Y*: 2.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCOR vs. FBNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCOR Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF	0.48%	7.88%	3.01%	8.95%	-15.88%	-1.64%	11.39%	14.87%	-3.04%	6.13%
FBNDX Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund	0.34%	7.37%	0.93%	6.51%	-14.04%	-1.13%	9.79%	9.82%	-0.35%	3.92%

Correlation

The correlation between FCOR and FBNDX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2014	0.77

The correlation between FCOR and FBNDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (all time) to 0.89 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FCOR vs. FBNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCOR

FCOR Risk / Return Rank: 38
FCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
FCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
FCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 37
FCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
FCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 39

FBNDX

FBNDX Risk / Return Rank: 19
FBNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
FBNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
FBNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
FBNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
FBNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCOR vs. FBNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF (FCOR) and Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund (FBNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCOR	FBNDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.39	1.25	+0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.02	1.88	+0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.22	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.99	1.70	+0.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.21	5.10	+1.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCOR vs. FBNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCOR Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the FBNDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCOR and FBNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCOR	FBNDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.39	1.25	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10	0.03	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41	0.42	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.53	-0.10

Drawdowns

FCOR vs. FBNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCOR drawdown since its inception was -22.60%, smaller than the maximum FBNDX drawdown of -42.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCOR and FBNDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCOR	FBNDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.60%	-42.76%	+20.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.06%	-3.02%	-0.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.60%	-6.09%	-0.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.60%	-18.74%	-3.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.60%	-18.74%	-3.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.18%	-1.62%	+0.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.73%	-10.34%	+5.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.98%	1.01%	-0.03%

Volatility

FCOR vs. FBNDX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF (FCOR) has a higher volatility of 1.61% compared to Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund (FBNDX) at 1.39%. This indicates that FCOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCOR	FBNDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.61%	1.39%	+0.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.32%	2.92%	+0.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.38%	4.12%	+0.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.06%	6.03%	+1.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.10%	5.02%	+2.08%

FCOR vs. FBNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCOR has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than FBNDX's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCOR vs. FBNDX - Dividend Comparison

FCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.55%, more than FBNDX's 3.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBNDX Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund	3.91%	3.87%	3.34%	3.56%	1.98%	1.34%	4.70%	2.75%	2.86%	2.18%	2.72%	2.66%
FCOR Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF	4.55%	4.47%	4.35%	3.70%	3.30%	2.34%	2.99%	3.10%	3.65%	2.81%	3.04%	3.82%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCOR and FBNDX in my portfolio?

FCOR and FBNDX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCOR or FBNDX?

FCOR has higher volatility (1.61%) compared to FBNDX (1.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCOR dropped -22.60% vs FBNDX's -42.76%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.