FCOR vs. LQD
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF (FCOR) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD).
FCOR and LQD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FCOR is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 6, 2014. LQD is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the iBoxx $ Liquid Investment Grade Index. It was launched on Jul 26, 2002.
Performance
FCOR vs. LQD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCOR vs. LQD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCOR Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF | -0.39% | 7.88% | 3.01% | 8.95% | -15.88% | -1.64% | 11.39% | 14.87% | -3.04% | 6.13% |
LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | -0.38% | 7.90% | 0.86% | 9.40% | -17.92% | -1.84% | 10.97% | 17.37% | -3.79% | 7.06% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FCOR having a -0.39% return and LQD slightly higher at -0.38%. Over the past 10 years, FCOR has outperformed LQD with an annualized return of 3.11%, while LQD has yielded a comparatively lower 2.61% annualized return.
FCOR
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -2.03%
- YTD
- -0.39%
- 6M
- 0.43%
- 1Y
- 4.95%
- 3Y*
- 5.13%
- 5Y*
- 0.83%
- 10Y*
- 3.11%
LQD
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -2.07%
- YTD
- -0.38%
- 6M
- -0.04%
- 1Y
- 4.88%
- 3Y*
- 4.26%
- 5Y*
- 0.09%
- 10Y*
- 2.61%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCOR vs. LQD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCOR has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than LQD's 0.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCOR vs. LQD — Risk / Return Rank
FCOR
LQD
FCOR vs. LQD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF (FCOR) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCOR | LQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.96 | 0.74 | +0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.31 | 1.04 | +0.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.14 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | 1.50 | +0.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.30 | 4.15 | +1.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCOR | LQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 | 0.74 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 0.01 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.30 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.54 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCOR and LQD is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FCOR vs. LQD - Dividend Comparison
FCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, which matches LQD's 4.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCOR Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF | 4.52% | 4.47% | 4.35% | 3.70% | 3.30% | 2.34% | 2.99% | 3.10% | 3.65% | 2.81% | 3.04% | 3.82% |
LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 4.52% | 4.48% | 4.45% | 3.99% | 3.30% | 2.30% | 2.66% | 3.29% | 3.67% | 3.10% | 3.34% | 3.47% |
Drawdowns
FCOR vs. LQD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCOR drawdown since its inception was -22.60%, smaller than the maximum LQD drawdown of -24.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCOR and LQD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCOR | LQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.60% | -24.95% | +2.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.13% | -3.38% | +0.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.60% | -24.95% | +2.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.60% | -24.95% | +2.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.03% | -4.52% | +2.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.78% | -3.99% | -0.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.99% | 1.22% | -0.23% |
Volatility
FCOR vs. LQD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF (FCOR) is 2.20%, while iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) has a volatility of 2.65%. This indicates that FCOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCOR | LQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.20% | 2.65% | -0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.05% | 3.76% | -0.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.22% | 6.60% | -1.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.06% | 8.66% | -1.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.12% | 8.67% | -1.55% |