PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCCR vs. AFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCCR vs. AFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Core Bond ETF (SCCR) and Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF (AFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCCR achieves a -0.67% return, which is significantly lower than AFIX's -0.53% return.


SCCR

1D
-0.35%
1M
-1.40%
6M
-0.79%
YTD
-0.67%
1Y
2.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.20%

AFIX

1D
-0.39%
1M
-1.28%
6M
-0.90%
YTD
-0.53%
1Y
2.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$424.05K$1.23M$562.83K
$6.54M$6.13M$7.30M

SCCR vs. AFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SCCR
Schwab Core Bond ETF
-0.67%7.00%
AFIX
Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF
-0.53%6.78%

Correlation

The correlation between SCCR and AFIX is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2025

0.93

The correlation between SCCR and AFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCCR vs. AFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SCCR
SCCR Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
SCCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCCR Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
SCCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCCR Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

AFIX
AFIX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
AFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
AFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SCCR vs. AFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Core Bond ETF (SCCR) and Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF (AFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCCRAFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.13

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.06

0.95

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.62

2.39

+0.23

SCCR vs. AFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCCR Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is comparable to the AFIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCCR and AFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCCR vs. AFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCCR drawdown since its inception was -2.81%, smaller than the maximum AFIX drawdown of -3.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCCR and AFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCCRAFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.81%

-3.33%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.81%

-3.10%

+0.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.53%

-2.70%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.85%

-1.04%

+0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.13%

1.23%

-0.10%

Volatility

SCCR vs. AFIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Core Bond ETF (SCCR) is 1.07%, while Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF (AFIX) has a volatility of 1.19%. This indicates that SCCR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCCRAFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.07%

1.19%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.96%

3.17%

-0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.70%

3.97%

-0.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.34%

4.53%

-0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.34%

4.53%

-0.19%

SCCR vs. AFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCCR has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than AFIX's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCCR vs. AFIX - Dividend Comparison

SCCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, less than AFIX's 5.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AFIX
Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF
5.18%4.94%0.38%
SCCR
Schwab Core Bond ETF
4.30%3.91%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, SCCR and AFIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AFIX has higher volatility (1.19%) compared to SCCR (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCCR dropped -2.81% vs AFIX's -3.33%.

On 1-year performance, SCCR leads with 2.35% vs 2.06% for AFIX. On fees, SCCR is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, SCCR has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SCCR has performed better with a 2.35% return vs 2.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCCR is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for AFIX.

AFIX has the higher dividend yield at 5.18%, compared with 4.30% for SCCR.

They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Allspring. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for SCCR and 0.20% for AFIX.

SCCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCCR and AFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer