PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFIX vs. AINP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFIX vs. AINP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF (AFIX) and Allspring Income Plus ETF (AINP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFIX achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly lower than AINP's 1.29% return.


AFIX

1D
-0.26%
1M
0.64%
YTD
0.47%
6M
0.63%
1Y
4.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AINP

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.69%
YTD
1.29%
6M
1.37%
1Y
5.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFIX vs. AINP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AFIX
Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF
0.47%7.52%-1.56%
AINP
Allspring Income Plus ETF
1.29%7.53%-1.22%

Correlation

The correlation between AFIX and AINP is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2024

0.74

The correlation between AFIX and AINP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFIX vs. AINP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFIX
AFIX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
AFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
AFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

AINP
AINP Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
AINP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AINP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
AINP Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
AINP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
AINP Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFIX vs. AINP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF (AFIX) and Allspring Income Plus ETF (AINP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AFIXAINPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.35

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

2.34

-0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.69

9.56

-4.88

AFIX vs. AINP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the AINP Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFIX and AINP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AFIX vs. AINP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFIX drawdown since its inception was -3.33%, which is greater than AINP's maximum drawdown of -2.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFIX and AINP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFIXAINPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.33%

-2.61%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.10%

-2.51%

-0.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.72%

-0.41%

-1.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.98%

-0.46%

-0.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.07%

0.61%

+0.46%

Volatility

AFIX vs. AINP - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF (AFIX) has a higher volatility of 1.17% compared to Allspring Income Plus ETF (AINP) at 0.96%. This indicates that AFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AINP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFIXAINPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.17%

0.96%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.98%

2.50%

+0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.95%

3.32%

+0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.54%

3.62%

+0.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.54%

3.62%

+0.92%

AFIX vs. AINP - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFIX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than AINP's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

AFIX vs. AINP - Dividend Comparison

AFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.01%, less than AINP's 5.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AFIX
Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF
5.01%4.94%0.38%
AINP
Allspring Income Plus ETF
5.77%5.03%0.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


AFIX and AINP have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AFIX has higher volatility (1.17%) compared to AINP (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFIX dropped -3.33% vs AINP's -2.61%.

On 1-year performance, AINP leads with 5.84% vs 4.99% for AFIX. On fees, AFIX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, AINP has been the lower-risk option at 0.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AINP has performed better with a 5.84% return vs 4.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AFIX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for AINP.

AINP has the higher dividend yield at 5.77%, compared with 5.01% for AFIX.

AFIX is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while AINP is Multisector Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AFIX and 0.36% for AINP.

AINP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFIX and AINP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer