PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFIX vs. IBGA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFIX vs. IBGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF (AFIX) and iShares iBonds Dec 2044 Term Treasury ETF (IBGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFIX achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly higher than IBGA's 0.28% return.


AFIX

1D
-0.26%
1M
0.64%
YTD
0.47%
6M
0.63%
1Y
4.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBGA

1D
-0.61%
1M
1.69%
YTD
0.28%
6M
0.30%
1Y
4.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFIX vs. IBGA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AFIX
Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF
0.47%7.52%-1.56%
IBGA
iShares iBonds Dec 2044 Term Treasury ETF
0.28%6.09%-4.98%

Correlation

The correlation between AFIX and IBGA is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2024

0.95

The correlation between AFIX and IBGA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFIX vs. IBGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFIX
AFIX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
AFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
AFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

IBGA
IBGA Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
IBGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBGA Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
IBGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBGA Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFIX vs. IBGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF (AFIX) and iShares iBonds Dec 2044 Term Treasury ETF (IBGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AFIXIBGADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.10

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

0.68

+0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.69

1.76

+2.93

AFIX vs. IBGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is higher than the IBGA Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFIX and IBGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AFIX vs. IBGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFIX drawdown since its inception was -3.33%, smaller than the maximum IBGA drawdown of -11.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFIX and IBGA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFIXIBGADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.33%

-11.69%

+8.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.10%

-6.60%

+3.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.72%

-4.04%

+2.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.98%

-5.03%

+4.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.07%

2.53%

-1.46%

Volatility

AFIX vs. IBGA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF (AFIX) is 1.17%, while iShares iBonds Dec 2044 Term Treasury ETF (IBGA) has a volatility of 1.97%. This indicates that AFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFIXIBGADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.17%

1.97%

-0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.98%

5.81%

-2.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.95%

8.01%

-4.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.54%

9.83%

-5.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.54%

9.83%

-5.29%

AFIX vs. IBGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFIX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IBGA's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AFIX vs. IBGA - Dividend Comparison

AFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.01%, more than IBGA's 4.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AFIX
Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF
5.01%4.94%0.38%
IBGA
iShares iBonds Dec 2044 Term Treasury ETF
4.63%4.49%2.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, AFIX and IBGA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IBGA has higher volatility (1.97%) compared to AFIX (1.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFIX dropped -3.33% vs IBGA's -11.69%.

On 1-year performance, AFIX leads with 4.99% vs 4.43% for IBGA. On fees, IBGA is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, AFIX has been the lower-risk option at 1.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AFIX has performed better with a 4.99% return vs 4.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBGA is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for AFIX.

AFIX has the higher dividend yield at 5.01%, compared with 4.63% for IBGA.

They also come from different issuers: Allspring and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AFIX and 0.07% for IBGA.

AFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFIX and IBGA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer