SCC vs. QLD
SCC (ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services) and QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - SCC tracks the DJ Global United States (All) / Consumer Services -IND (-200%) while QLD tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCC returned -24.95%/yr vs 36.27%/yr for QLD. At a correlation of -0.74, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
SCC vs. QLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCC achieves a 8.21% return, which is significantly lower than QLD's 29.58% return. Over the past 10 years, SCC has underperformed QLD with an annualized return of -24.95%, while QLD has yielded a comparatively higher 36.27% annualized return.
SCC
- 1D
- 2.43%
- 1M
- 8.97%
- YTD
- 8.21%
- 6M
- 13.36%
- 1Y
- -12.48%
- 3Y*
- -21.64%
- 5Y*
- -14.17%
- 10Y*
- -24.95%
QLD
- 1D
- -6.61%
- 1M
- -2.02%
- YTD
- 29.58%
- 6M
- 26.13%
- 1Y
- 66.80%
- 3Y*
- 43.61%
- 5Y*
- 21.41%
- 10Y*
- 36.27%
SCC vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCC ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services | 8.21% | -18.97% | -36.01% | -44.34% | 64.09% | -25.84% | -54.75% | -38.94% | -8.53% | -31.58% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 29.58% | 30.36% | 42.82% | 117.72% | -60.52% | 54.67% | 88.90% | 81.69% | -8.31% | 70.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCC and QLD is -0.70, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2007 | -0.74 |
The correlation between SCC and QLD shifts across timeframes, from -0.83 (5 years) to -0.70 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCC vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank
SCC
QLD
SCC vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services (SCC) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCC | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.31 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | 2.67 | -3.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.72 | 9.05 | -9.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCC vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCC drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, which is greater than QLD's maximum drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCC and QLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCC | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.92% | -83.13% | -16.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.45% | -25.13% | -1.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.10% | -42.29% | -24.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.34% | -63.68% | -13.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.55% | -63.68% | -31.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.90% | -9.26% | -90.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -85.97% | -18.14% | -67.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.30% | 7.40% | +9.90% |
Volatility
SCC vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services (SCC) is 12.97%, while ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has a volatility of 18.22%. This indicates that SCC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCC | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.97% | 18.22% | -5.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.84% | 28.95% | -1.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.09% | 35.77% | +1.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.20% | 45.34% | -1.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.67% | 44.80% | -5.13% |
SCC vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SCC and QLD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
SCC vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison
SCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, more than QLD's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.06% | 0.02% | 0.21% | 0.11% |
SCC ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services | 4.35% | 4.87% | 7.46% | 4.53% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 2.67% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCC and QLD have a correlation of -0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QLD has higher volatility (18.22%) compared to SCC (12.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCC dropped -99.92% vs QLD's -83.13%.
On 10-year performance, QLD leads with 36.27% vs -24.95% for SCC. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, SCC has been the lower-risk option at 12.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QLD has performed better with a 36.27% return vs -24.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCC and QLD have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
SCC has the higher dividend yield at 4.35%, compared with 0.13% for QLD.
SCC tracks DJ Global United States (All) / Consumer Services -IND (-200%), while QLD tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%).
QLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCC and QLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer