SCA vs. AMDL
SCA (GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF) and AMDL (GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCA is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while AMDL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (200%). SCA is actively managed, while AMDL is passively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 1.07% expense ratio.
Performance
SCA vs. AMDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SCA
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
AMDL
- 1D
- -4.63%
- 1M
- 1.97%
- 6M
- 219.35%
- YTD
- 339.29%
- 1Y
- 553.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 52.17%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $190.85M | $243.22M | $384.39M | |
| $4.59K | $7.11K | $8.84K |
SCA vs. AMDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SCA GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF | -6.10% |
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF | 2.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCA and AMDL is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCA vs. AMDL — Risk / Return Rank
SCA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AMDL
SCA vs. AMDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF (SCA) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCA | AMDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.44 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 9.94 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 19.06 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCA vs. AMDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCA drawdown since its inception was -27.40%, smaller than the maximum AMDL drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCA and AMDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCA | AMDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.40% | -88.63% | +61.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -56.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.90% | -17.45% | +6.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.01% | -46.61% | +33.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 29.21% | — |
Volatility
SCA vs. AMDL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCA | AMDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 41.32% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 107.09% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.79% | 138.27% | -75.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.79% | 119.35% | -56.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.79% | 119.35% | -56.56% |
SCA vs. AMDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SCA and AMDL have an expense ratio of 1.07%.
Dividends
SCA vs. AMDL - Dividend Comparison
SCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.36%, while AMDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF | 0.00% |
SCA GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF | 7.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCA and AMDL have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 1.07% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCA and AMDL have the same expense ratio: 1.07% per year.
SCA has the higher dividend yield at 7.36%, compared with 0.00% for AMDL.
SCA is categorized as Derivative Income, while AMDL is Leveraged Equities.
Find the right allocation for SCA and AMDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer