SBUX vs. MLPX
SBUX (Starbucks Corporation) is a stock, while MLPX (Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF) is MLPs fund tracking the Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index. Over the past 10 years, SBUX returned 8.63%/yr vs 12.45%/yr for MLPX. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SBUX vs. MLPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBUX achieves a 21.48% return, which is significantly lower than MLPX's 25.35% return. Over the past 10 years, SBUX has underperformed MLPX with an annualized return of 8.63%, while MLPX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.45% annualized return.
SBUX
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- -2.00%
- YTD
- 21.48%
- 6M
- 21.99%
- 1Y
- 12.32%
- 3Y*
- 3.47%
- 5Y*
- 0.28%
- 10Y*
- 8.63%
MLPX
- 1D
- 1.68%
- 1M
- -3.98%
- YTD
- 25.35%
- 6M
- 25.51%
- 1Y
- 27.11%
- 3Y*
- 29.56%
- 5Y*
- 21.27%
- 10Y*
- 12.45%
SBUX vs. MLPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBUX Starbucks Corporation | 21.48% | -5.26% | -2.48% | -1.19% | -13.18% | 11.15% | 24.19% | 39.09% | 14.74% | 5.36% |
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 25.35% | 4.96% | 42.90% | 15.77% | 21.54% | 39.63% | -20.32% | 19.04% | -15.64% | -4.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBUX and MLPX is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2013 | 0.26 |
The correlation between SBUX and MLPX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBUX vs. MLPX — Risk / Return Rank
SBUX
MLPX
SBUX vs. MLPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SBUX | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.30 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | 3.33 | -2.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.47 | 8.00 | -6.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SBUX vs. MLPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBUX drawdown since its inception was -81.91%, which is greater than MLPX's maximum drawdown of -70.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBUX and MLPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBUX | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.91% | -70.67% | -11.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.53% | -8.18% | -10.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.97% | -16.77% | -15.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.68% | -19.72% | -23.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.68% | -64.70% | +21.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.92% | -4.34% | -5.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.24% | -16.58% | +0.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.40% | 3.40% | +5.00% |
Volatility
SBUX vs. MLPX - Volatility Comparison
Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) has a higher volatility of 7.31% compared to Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) at 5.80%. This indicates that SBUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBUX | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.31% | 5.80% | +1.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.73% | 11.78% | +8.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.47% | 15.43% | +13.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.71% | 19.99% | +11.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.49% | 26.47% | +3.02% |
Dividends
SBUX vs. MLPX - Dividend Comparison
SBUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, less than MLPX's 4.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.09% | 4.88% | 4.30% | 5.22% | 5.23% | 5.98% | 8.32% | 5.78% | 5.77% | 4.36% | 5.50% | 4.81% |
SBUX Starbucks Corporation | 2.44% | 2.91% | 2.54% | 2.25% | 2.02% | 1.57% | 1.57% | 1.69% | 2.05% | 1.83% | 1.53% | 1.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SBUX and MLPX have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SBUX has higher volatility (7.31%) compared to MLPX (5.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBUX dropped -81.91% vs MLPX's -70.67%.
MLPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SBUX and MLPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer