SBUX vs. CMG
SBUX (Starbucks Corporation) and CMG (Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Restaurants industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Over the past 10 years, SBUX returned 8.30%/yr vs 14.98%/yr for CMG. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
SBUX vs. CMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBUX achieves a 25.19% return, which is significantly higher than CMG's -7.46% return. Over the past 10 years, SBUX has underperformed CMG with an annualized return of 8.30%, while CMG has yielded a comparatively higher 14.98% annualized return.
SBUX
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- 6M
- 10.79%
- YTD
- 25.19%
- 1Y
- 14.98%
- 3Y*
- 3.50%
- 5Y*
- -0.74%
- 10Y*
- 8.30%
- ALL TIME*
- 19.47%
CMG
- 1D
- 2.18%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- 6M
- -12.56%
- YTD
- -7.46%
- 1Y
- -22.85%
- 3Y*
- -3.62%
- 5Y*
- -1.68%
- 10Y*
- 14.98%
- ALL TIME*
- 19.42%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $546.12M | $565.36M | $613.89M | |
| $726.14M | $696.51M | $760.88M |
SBUX vs. CMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBUX Starbucks Corporation | 25.19% | -5.26% | -2.48% | -1.19% | -13.18% | 11.15% | 24.19% | 39.09% | 14.74% | 5.36% |
CMG Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. | -7.46% | -38.64% | 31.83% | 64.83% | -20.64% | 26.07% | 65.65% | 93.87% | 49.39% | -23.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBUX and CMG is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2006 | 0.45 |
Fundamentals
SBUX:
$118.69B
CMG:
$43.92B
SBUX:
$1.74
CMG:
$1.08
SBUX:
60.01
CMG:
31.67
SBUX:
3.10
CMG:
3.62
SBUX:
$38.33B
CMG:
$12.42B
SBUX:
$12.17B
CMG:
$5.89B
SBUX:
$5.60B
CMG:
$2.25B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBUX vs. CMG — Risk / Return Rank
SBUX
CMG
SBUX vs. CMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) and Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SBUX | CMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 0.92 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | -0.64 | +1.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.16 | -1.15 | +3.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SBUX vs. CMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBUX drawdown since its inception was -81.91%, which is greater than CMG's maximum drawdown of -74.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBUX and CMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBUX | CMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.91% | -74.61% | -7.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.14% | -36.01% | +19.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.97% | -58.89% | +26.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.54% | -58.89% | +17.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.68% | -58.89% | +15.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.17% | -50.05% | +42.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.21% | -21.55% | +5.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.95% | 20.35% | -13.40% |
Volatility
SBUX vs. CMG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) is 6.56%, while Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) has a volatility of 12.71%. This indicates that SBUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBUX | CMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.56% | 12.71% | -6.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.13% | 26.31% | -6.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.38% | 37.74% | -9.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.71% | 33.71% | -2.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.50% | 35.76% | -6.26% |
Dividends
SBUX vs. CMG - Dividend Comparison
SBUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, while CMG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMG Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SBUX Starbucks Corporation | 2.37% | 2.91% | 2.54% | 2.25% | 2.02% | 1.57% | 1.57% | 1.69% | 2.05% | 1.83% | 1.53% | 1.13% |
Financials
SBUX vs. CMG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Starbucks Corporation and Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SBUX vs. CMG - Profitability Comparison
SBUX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Starbucks Corporation reported a gross profit of 6.49B and revenue of 9.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.7%.
CMG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.34B and revenue of 3.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.8%.
SBUX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Starbucks Corporation reported an operating income of 980.40M and revenue of 9.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.5%.
CMG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. reported an operating income of 525.60M and revenue of 3.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.7%.
SBUX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Starbucks Corporation reported a net income of 1.05B and revenue of 9.32B, resulting in a net margin of 11.2%.
CMG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. reported a net income of 403.55M and revenue of 3.35B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SBUX and CMG have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CMG has higher volatility (12.71%) compared to SBUX (6.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBUX dropped -81.91% vs CMG's -74.61%.
SBUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SBUX and CMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer