PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBTU vs. SBU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SBTU vs. SBU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF (SBTU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long SBUX Daily ETF (SBU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBTU achieves a -78.65% return, which is significantly lower than SBU's 34.45% return.


SBTU

1D
-12.70%
1M
-39.34%
YTD
-78.65%
6M
-80.08%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SBU

1D
2.30%
1M
-4.51%
YTD
34.45%
6M
35.06%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBTU vs. SBU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SBTU and SBU is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025

0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBTU vs. SBU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF (SBTU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long SBUX Daily ETF (SBU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SBTU vs. SBU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SBTU vs. SBU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBTU drawdown since its inception was -93.04%, which is greater than SBU's maximum drawdown of -28.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBTU and SBU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBTUSBUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.04%

-28.10%

-64.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.04%

-11.63%

-81.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.92%

-7.39%

-62.53%

Volatility

SBTU vs. SBU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBTUSBUDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

160.40%

59.26%

+101.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

160.40%

59.26%

+101.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

160.40%

59.26%

+101.14%

SBTU vs. SBU - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBTU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SBU's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

SBTU vs. SBU - Dividend Comparison

Neither SBTU nor SBU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SBTU and SBU have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SBU is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SBU is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for SBTU.

SBTU and SBU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Tuttle Capital Management and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for SBTU and 0.75% for SBU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBTU and SBU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer