SBTU vs. PYPG
SBTU (T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF) and PYPG (Leverage Shares 2X Long PYPL Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SBTU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PYPG.
Performance
SBTU vs. PYPG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBTU achieves a -72.45% return, which is significantly lower than PYPG's -23.41% return.
SBTU
- 1D
- -10.13%
- 1M
- 1.91%
- 6M
- -79.40%
- YTD
- -72.45%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PYPG
- 1D
- 4.02%
- 1M
- 61.13%
- 6M
- -18.36%
- YTD
- -23.41%
- 1Y
- -56.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SBTU vs. PYPG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SBTU T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF | -72.45% | -67.09% |
PYPG Leverage Shares 2X Long PYPL Daily ETF | -23.41% | -31.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBTU and PYPG is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2025 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBTU vs. PYPG — Risk / Return Rank
SBTU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PYPG
SBTU vs. PYPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF (SBTU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long PYPL Daily ETF (PYPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SBTU | PYPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.91 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.71 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.00 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SBTU vs. PYPG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBTU drawdown since its inception was -94.22%, which is greater than PYPG's maximum drawdown of -79.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBTU and PYPG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBTU | PYPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.22% | -79.52% | -14.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -79.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.01% | -61.72% | -29.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.86% | -41.31% | -30.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 56.30% | — |
Volatility
SBTU vs. PYPG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBTU | PYPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 34.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 77.11% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 159.58% | 85.35% | +74.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 159.58% | 83.28% | +76.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 159.58% | 83.28% | +76.30% |
SBTU vs. PYPG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SBTU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PYPG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SBTU vs. PYPG - Dividend Comparison
Neither SBTU nor PYPG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SBTU and PYPG have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PYPG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PYPG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for SBTU.
SBTU and PYPG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tuttle Capital Management and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for SBTU and 0.75% for PYPG.
Find the right allocation for SBTU and PYPG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer