SBTU vs. INTW
SBTU (T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF) and INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.50% expense ratio.
Performance
SBTU vs. INTW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBTU achieves a -78.65% return, which is significantly lower than INTW's 750.22% return.
SBTU
- 1D
- -12.70%
- 1M
- -39.34%
- YTD
- -78.65%
- 6M
- -80.08%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INTW
- 1D
- -12.49%
- 1M
- 12.21%
- YTD
- 750.22%
- 6M
- 775.58%
- 1Y
- 1,964.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SBTU vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SBTU T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF | -78.65% | -67.09% |
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF | 750.22% | -12.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBTU and INTW is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2025 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBTU vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank
SBTU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
INTW
SBTU vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF (SBTU) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SBTU | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.65 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 40.32 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 91.49 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SBTU vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBTU drawdown since its inception was -93.04%, which is greater than INTW's maximum drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBTU and INTW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBTU | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.04% | -60.58% | -32.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -49.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.04% | -12.49% | -80.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.92% | -29.66% | -40.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 21.70% | — |
Volatility
SBTU vs. INTW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBTU | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 55.81% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 119.10% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 160.40% | 150.14% | +10.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 160.40% | 148.88% | +11.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 160.40% | 148.88% | +11.52% |
SBTU vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SBTU and INTW have an expense ratio of 1.50%.
Dividends
SBTU vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison
Neither SBTU nor INTW has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SBTU and INTW have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 1.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SBTU and INTW have the same expense ratio: 1.50% per year.
SBTU and INTW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tuttle Capital Management and GraniteShares.
Find the right allocation for SBTU and INTW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer