SBTU vs. COIG
SBTU (T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF) and COIG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SBTU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for COIG.
Performance
SBTU vs. COIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBTU achieves a -78.65% return, which is significantly lower than COIG's -65.79% return.
SBTU
- 1D
- -12.70%
- 1M
- -39.34%
- YTD
- -78.65%
- 6M
- -80.08%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COIG
- 1D
- -8.16%
- 1M
- -30.67%
- YTD
- -65.79%
- 6M
- -70.38%
- 1Y
- -86.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SBTU vs. COIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SBTU T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF | -78.65% | -67.09% |
COIG Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF | -65.79% | -61.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBTU and COIG is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2025 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBTU vs. COIG — Risk / Return Rank
SBTU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
COIG
SBTU vs. COIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF (SBTU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SBTU | COIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.87 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.93 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.25 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SBTU vs. COIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBTU drawdown since its inception was -93.04%, roughly equal to the maximum COIG drawdown of -92.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBTU and COIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBTU | COIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.04% | -92.67% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -92.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.04% | -92.31% | -0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.92% | -53.17% | -16.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 69.09% | — |
Volatility
SBTU vs. COIG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBTU | COIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 36.15% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 101.97% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 160.40% | 135.55% | +24.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 160.40% | 145.22% | +15.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 160.40% | 145.22% | +15.18% |
SBTU vs. COIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SBTU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than COIG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SBTU vs. COIG - Dividend Comparison
Neither SBTU nor COIG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SBTU and COIG have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COIG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COIG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for SBTU.
SBTU and COIG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tuttle Capital Management and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for SBTU and 0.75% for COIG.
Find the right allocation for SBTU and COIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer