SBTU vs. AMDG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SBTU (T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF) and AMDG (Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SBTU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AMDG.

Performance

SBTU vs. AMDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF (SBTU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBTU achieves a -78.65% return, which is significantly lower than AMDG's 329.09% return.

SBTU

• 1D: -12.70%
• 1M: -39.34%
• YTD: -78.65%
• 6M: -80.08%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMDG

• 1D: -11.43%
• 1M: 15.85%
• YTD: 329.09%
• 6M: 325.72%
• 1Y: 826.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBTU vs. AMDG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SBTU T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF	-78.65%	-67.09%
AMDG Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF	329.09%	-27.08%

Correlation

The correlation between SBTU and AMDG is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2025	0.45

Return for Risk

SBTU vs. AMDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBTU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AMDG

AMDG Risk / Return Rank: 94
AMDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
AMDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
AMDG Omega Ratio Rank: 89
AMDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
AMDG Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBTU vs. AMDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF (SBTU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SBTU	AMDG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	6.20	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	4.04	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.53	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	14.77	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	28.66	—

Drawdowns

SBTU vs. AMDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBTU drawdown since its inception was -93.04%, which is greater than AMDG's maximum drawdown of -63.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBTU and AMDG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SBTU	AMDG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.04%	-63.32%	-29.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-56.48%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-93.04%	-12.62%	-80.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-69.92%	-25.39%	-44.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	29.06%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SBTU	AMDG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	48.45%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	102.73%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	160.40%	134.55%	+25.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	160.40%	132.44%	+27.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	160.40%	132.44%	+27.96%

SBTU vs. AMDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBTU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

SBTU vs. AMDG - Dividend Comparison

SBTU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%.

Position	TTM	2025
AMDG Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF	2.61%	11.21%
SBTU T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SBTU and AMDG in my portfolio?

SBTU and AMDG have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SBTU or AMDG?

On fees, AMDG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SBTU or AMDG?

AMDG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for SBTU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SBTU or AMDG?

AMDG has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 0.00% for SBTU.

What is the main difference between SBTU and AMDG?

They also come from different issuers: Tuttle Capital Management and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for SBTU and 0.75% for AMDG.