SBS vs. GFI
SBS (Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP) and GFI (Gold Fields Limited) are both stocks. SBS operates in Utilities - Regulated Water (Utilities), while GFI operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, SBS returned 16.43%/yr vs 27.45%/yr for GFI. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SBS vs. GFI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBS achieves a 15.28% return, which is significantly higher than GFI's -13.96% return. Over the past 10 years, SBS has underperformed GFI with an annualized return of 16.43%, while GFI has yielded a comparatively higher 27.45% annualized return.
SBS
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -6.98%
- YTD
- 15.28%
- 6M
- 14.60%
- 1Y
- 38.40%
- 3Y*
- 40.12%
- 5Y*
- 32.68%
- 10Y*
- 16.43%
GFI
- 1D
- 1.67%
- 1M
- -18.49%
- YTD
- -13.96%
- 6M
- -13.63%
- 1Y
- 50.40%
- 3Y*
- 39.19%
- 5Y*
- 32.03%
- 10Y*
- 27.45%
SBS vs. GFI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBS Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP | 15.28% | 80.60% | -4.21% | 46.89% | 48.42% | -13.79% | -40.98% | 91.22% | -20.37% | 23.83% |
GFI Gold Fields Limited | -13.96% | 240.42% | -6.27% | 44.90% | -2.61% | 23.33% | 43.02% | 89.47% | -16.75% | 45.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBS and GFI is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2007 | 0.21 |
The correlation between SBS and GFI shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (10 years) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SBS:
$19.24B
GFI:
$32.65B
SBS:
R$2.48
GFI:
$5.39
SBS:
11.24
GFI:
6.78
SBS:
0.22
GFI:
0.11
SBS:
2.48
GFI:
2.34
SBS:
2.27
GFI:
3.87
SBS:
R$38.70B
GFI:
$13.98B
SBS:
R$13.96B
GFI:
$7.34B
SBS:
R$14.87B
GFI:
$8.04B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBS vs. GFI — Risk / Return Rank
SBS
GFI
SBS vs. GFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP (SBS) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SBS | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.18 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | 1.15 | +0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.65 | 3.06 | +1.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SBS vs. GFI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBS drawdown since its inception was -76.49%, smaller than the maximum GFI drawdown of -88.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBS and GFI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBS | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.49% | -88.05% | +11.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.88% | -43.90% | +19.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.88% | -43.90% | +19.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.35% | -56.22% | +25.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.91% | -63.09% | +1.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.90% | -38.93% | +16.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.70% | -44.25% | +18.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.28% | 16.51% | -8.23% |
Volatility
SBS vs. GFI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP (SBS) is 8.92%, while Gold Fields Limited (GFI) has a volatility of 17.70%. This indicates that SBS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBS | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.92% | 17.70% | -8.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.61% | 46.40% | -21.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.86% | 59.94% | -26.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.90% | 52.37% | -15.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.51% | 54.90% | -11.39% |
Dividends
SBS vs. GFI - Dividend Comparison
SBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, less than GFI's 5.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFI Gold Fields Limited | 5.04% | 1.77% | 2.94% | 2.87% | 3.40% | 3.24% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 1.61% | 1.41% | 1.35% | 0.60% |
SBS Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP | 2.33% | 4.68% | 1.96% | 1.66% | 1.88% | 0.97% | 2.93% | 1.99% | 3.86% | 2.76% | 0.65% | 1.91% |
Financials
SBS vs. GFI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP and Gold Fields Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SBS vs. GFI - Profitability Comparison
SBS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP reported a gross profit of 3.79B and revenue of 9.78B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.8%.
GFI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a gross profit of 3.00B and revenue of 5.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.7%.
SBS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP reported an operating income of 3.33B and revenue of 9.78B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.1%.
GFI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported an operating income of 2.71B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 51.3%.
SBS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP reported a net income of 1.72B and revenue of 9.78B, resulting in a net margin of 17.6%.
GFI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SBS and GFI have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GFI has higher volatility (17.70%) compared to SBS (8.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBS dropped -76.49% vs GFI's -88.05%.
SBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SBS and GFI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer