SBLK vs. STM
SBLK (Star Bulk Carriers Corp.) and STM (STMicroelectronics N.V.) are both stocks. SBLK operates in Marine Shipping (Industrials), while STM operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 10 years, SBLK returned 29.24%/yr vs 29.42%/yr for STM. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SBLK vs. STM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBLK achieves a 41.89% return, which is significantly lower than STM's 176.58% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SBLK having a 29.24% annualized return and STM not far ahead at 29.42%.
SBLK
- 1D
- 1.82%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- 6M
- 38.85%
- YTD
- 41.89%
- 1Y
- 48.44%
- 3Y*
- 23.17%
- 5Y*
- 17.99%
- 10Y*
- 29.24%
STM
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -8.42%
- 6M
- 148.77%
- YTD
- 176.58%
- 1Y
- 123.79%
- 3Y*
- 14.24%
- 5Y*
- 14.33%
- 10Y*
- 29.42%
SBLK vs. STM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBLK Star Bulk Carriers Corp. | 41.89% | 30.76% | -21.04% | 19.24% | 8.50% | 185.15% | -24.77% | 29.82% | -18.83% | 120.35% |
STM STMicroelectronics N.V. | 176.58% | 5.28% | -49.67% | 41.66% | -26.76% | 32.39% | 38.91% | 96.34% | -35.65% | 94.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBLK and STM is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2006 | 0.25 |
Fundamentals
SBLK:
$2.94B
STM:
$63.77B
SBLK:
$1.25
STM:
$0.15
SBLK:
21.00
STM:
468.06
SBLK:
2.73
STM:
5.46
SBLK:
1.21
STM:
3.72
SBLK:
$1.09B
STM:
$12.40B
SBLK:
$377.07M
STM:
$4.20B
SBLK:
$377.39M
STM:
$2.32B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBLK vs. STM — Risk / Return Rank
SBLK
STM
SBLK vs. STM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) and STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SBLK | STM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.36 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 3.26 | -0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.05 | 7.35 | +0.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SBLK vs. STM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBLK drawdown since its inception was -99.76%, which is greater than STM's maximum drawdown of -94.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBLK and STM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBLK | STM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.76% | -94.40% | -5.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.49% | -36.35% | +18.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.44% | -66.66% | +18.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.44% | -66.66% | +18.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.77% | -66.66% | -7.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.60% | -10.47% | -83.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.73% | -55.08% | -27.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.55% | 16.12% | -9.57% |
Volatility
SBLK vs. STM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) is 10.44%, while STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM) has a volatility of 22.31%. This indicates that SBLK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBLK | STM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.44% | 22.31% | -11.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.70% | 44.40% | -20.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.33% | 56.14% | -25.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.70% | 45.82% | -3.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.07% | 44.53% | +7.54% |
Dividends
SBLK vs. STM - Dividend Comparison
SBLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, more than STM's 0.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBLK Star Bulk Carriers Corp. | 3.91% | 1.56% | 16.72% | 7.38% | 33.80% | 9.93% | 0.57% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STM STMicroelectronics N.V. | 0.50% | 1.39% | 1.32% | 0.48% | 0.67% | 0.45% | 0.50% | 0.89% | 1.73% | 0.98% | 2.10% | 5.11% |
Financials
SBLK vs. STM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Star Bulk Carriers Corp. and STMicroelectronics N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SBLK vs. STM - Profitability Comparison
SBLK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. reported a gross profit of 92.95M and revenue of 281.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.1%.
STM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, STMicroelectronics N.V. reported a gross profit of 1.05B and revenue of 3.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.8%.
SBLK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. reported an operating income of 73.02M and revenue of 281.15M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.0%.
STM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, STMicroelectronics N.V. reported an operating income of 96.00M and revenue of 3.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.1%.
SBLK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. reported a net income of 58.53M and revenue of 281.15M, resulting in a net margin of 20.8%.
STM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, STMicroelectronics N.V. reported a net income of 37.00M and revenue of 3.10B, resulting in a net margin of 1.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SBLK and STM have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STM has higher volatility (22.31%) compared to SBLK (10.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBLK dropped -99.76% vs STM's -94.40%.
STM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SBLK and STM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer