SBIO vs. PBPH
SBIO (ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF) and PBPH (Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - SBIO tracks the S-Network Medical Breakthroughs Index while PBPH tracks the BITA Global Pharma and Biotech Select Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SBIO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for PBPH.
Performance
SBIO vs. PBPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBIO achieves a 18.79% return, which is significantly higher than PBPH's 2.63% return.
SBIO
- 1D
- 2.88%
- 1M
- 14.15%
- YTD
- 18.79%
- 6M
- 15.02%
- 1Y
- 98.14%
- 3Y*
- 25.22%
- 5Y*
- 4.73%
- 10Y*
- 11.54%
PBPH
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 2.63%
- 6M
- 2.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SBIO vs. PBPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SBIO ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF | 18.79% | 6.22% |
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | 2.63% | 0.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBIO and PBPH is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025 | 0.54 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBIO vs. PBPH — Risk / Return Rank
SBIO
PBPH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SBIO vs. PBPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF (SBIO) and Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF (PBPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SBIO | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.80 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.75 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SBIO vs. PBPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBIO drawdown since its inception was -63.06%, which is greater than PBPH's maximum drawdown of -11.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBIO and PBPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBIO | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.06% | -11.10% | -51.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | -5.21% | +4.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.36% | -4.36% | -24.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.53% | — | — |
Volatility
SBIO vs. PBPH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBIO | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.21% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.75% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.51% | 17.07% | +13.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.76% | 17.07% | +16.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.20% | 17.07% | +16.13% |
SBIO vs. PBPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
SBIO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PBPH's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
SBIO vs. PBPH - Dividend Comparison
SBIO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PBPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SBIO ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.55% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 2.79% | 1.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SBIO and PBPH have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBPH is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBPH is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SBIO.
PBPH has the higher dividend yield at 0.09%, compared with 0.00% for SBIO.
SBIO tracks S-Network Medical Breakthroughs Index, while PBPH tracks BITA Global Pharma and Biotech Select Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and Portfolio Building Block. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SBIO and 0.13% for PBPH.
Find the right allocation for SBIO and PBPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer