SBIL vs. LALT

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

SBIL (Simplify Government Money Market ETF) and LALT (First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SBIL is a Money Market fund actively managed by Simplify, while LALT is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SBIL returned 3.82% vs 17.54% for LALT. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. SBIL charges 0.15%/yr vs 1.94%/yr for LALT.

Performance

SBIL vs. LALT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Government Money Market ETF (SBIL) and First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF (LALT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBIL achieves a 1.91% return, which is significantly lower than LALT's 8.34% return.

SBIL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.28%
• 6M: 1.76%
• YTD: 1.91%
• 1Y: 3.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LALT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.97%
• 6M: 5.47%
• YTD: 8.34%
• 1Y: 17.54%
• 3Y*: 9.46%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBIL vs. LALT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SBIL Simplify Government Money Market ETF	1.91%	1.88%
LALT First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF	8.34%	7.80%

Correlation

The correlation between SBIL and LALT is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025	-0.04

Return for Risk

SBIL vs. LALT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBIL

SBIL Risk / Return Rank: 100
SBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
SBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
SBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100
SBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
SBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100

LALT

LALT Risk / Return Rank: 91
LALT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
LALT Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
LALT Omega Ratio Rank: 92
LALT Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
LALT Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBIL vs. LALT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Government Money Market ETF (SBIL) and First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF (LALT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SBIL	LALT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	14.52	2.52	+12.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	52.25	3.48	+48.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	11.71	1.48	+10.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	128.05	4.74	+123.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	782.04	14.63	+767.41

SBIL vs. LALT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBIL Sharpe Ratio is 14.52, which is higher than the LALT Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBIL and LALT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SBIL vs. LALT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBIL drawdown since its inception was -0.03%, smaller than the maximum LALT drawdown of -6.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBIL and LALT.

Drawdown Indicators

	SBIL	LALT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.03%	-6.97%	+6.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.03%	-3.72%	+3.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-6.97%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.91%	+2.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.00%	-1.04%	+1.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.00%	1.20%	-1.20%

Volatility

SBIL vs. LALT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Simplify Government Money Market ETF (SBIL) is 0.04%, while First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF (LALT) has a volatility of 1.46%. This indicates that SBIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LALT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SBIL	LALT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.04%	1.46%	-1.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.18%	5.58%	-5.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26%	7.00%	-6.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.26%	5.80%	-5.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.26%	5.80%	-5.54%

SBIL vs. LALT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBIL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than LALT's 1.94% expense ratio.

Dividends

SBIL vs. LALT - Dividend Comparison

SBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, less than LALT's 3.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
LALT First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF	3.74%	2.03%	2.06%	2.44%
SBIL Simplify Government Money Market ETF	3.55%	1.79%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SBIL and LALT in my portfolio?

SBIL and LALT have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SBIL or LALT?

LALT has higher volatility (1.46%) compared to SBIL (0.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBIL dropped -0.03% vs LALT's -6.97%.

Which ETF is better, SBIL or LALT?

On 1-year performance, LALT leads with 17.54% vs 3.82% for SBIL. On fees, SBIL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SBIL or LALT?

Over the 1-year period, LALT has performed better with a 17.54% return vs 3.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SBIL or LALT?

SBIL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.94% for LALT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SBIL or LALT?

LALT has the higher dividend yield at 3.74%, compared with 3.55% for SBIL.

What is the main difference between SBIL and LALT?

SBIL is categorized as Money Market, while LALT is Global Allocation. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SBIL and 1.94% for LALT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.52 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.