SBIL vs. IBMQ

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

SBIL (Simplify Government Money Market ETF) and IBMQ (iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Muni Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SBIL is a Money Market fund actively managed by Simplify, while IBMQ is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Callable-Adjusted Dec 2028 Index. SBIL is actively managed, while IBMQ is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. SBIL charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IBMQ.

Performance

SBIL vs. IBMQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Government Money Market ETF (SBIL) and iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBIL achieves a 1.51% return, which is significantly higher than IBMQ's 0.77% return.

SBIL

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.31%
• YTD: 1.51%
• 6M: 1.81%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBMQ

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: 0.77%
• 6M: 1.32%
• 1Y: 3.69%
• 3Y*: 2.99%
• 5Y*: 0.53%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBIL vs. IBMQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SBIL Simplify Government Money Market ETF	1.51%	1.88%
IBMQ iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Muni Bond ETF	0.77%	1.72%

Correlation

The correlation between SBIL and IBMQ is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025	-0.12

Return for Risk

SBIL vs. IBMQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBMQ

IBMQ Risk / Return Rank: 78
IBMQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
IBMQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
IBMQ Omega Ratio Rank: 93
IBMQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
IBMQ Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBIL vs. IBMQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Government Money Market ETF (SBIL) and iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SBIL	IBMQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.08	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.18	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	14.15	0.36	+13.78

Drawdowns

SBIL vs. IBMQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBIL drawdown since its inception was -0.03%, smaller than the maximum IBMQ drawdown of -15.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBIL and IBMQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	SBIL	IBMQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.03%	-15.85%	+15.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-1.13%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-3.57%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-11.51%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.25%	+0.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.00%	-3.26%	+3.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.43%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SBIL	IBMQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.33%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.88%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28%	1.20%	-0.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.28%	2.96%	-2.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.28%	5.55%	-5.27%

SBIL vs. IBMQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBIL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IBMQ's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SBIL vs. IBMQ - Dividend Comparison

SBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, more than IBMQ's 2.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
IBMQ iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Muni Bond ETF	2.45%	2.43%	2.33%	1.93%	1.25%	1.05%	1.24%	1.03%
SBIL Simplify Government Money Market ETF	3.26%	1.79%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SBIL and IBMQ in my portfolio?

SBIL and IBMQ have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SBIL or IBMQ?

On fees, SBIL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SBIL or IBMQ?

SBIL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IBMQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SBIL or IBMQ?

SBIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 2.45% for IBMQ.

What is the main difference between SBIL and IBMQ?

SBIL is categorized as Money Market, while IBMQ is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SBIL and 0.18% for IBMQ.