IBMQ vs. TEMT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

IBMQ (iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Muni Bond ETF) and TEMT (Tradr 2X Long TEM Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBMQ is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Callable-Adjusted Dec 2028 Index, while TEMT is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr. IBMQ is passively managed, while TEMT is actively managed. Over the past year, IBMQ returned 2.02% vs -64.23% for TEMT. Their 0.05 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. IBMQ charges 0.18%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for TEMT.

Performance

IBMQ vs. TEMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMQ) and Tradr 2X Long TEM Daily ETF (TEMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBMQ achieves a 0.90% return, which is significantly higher than TEMT's -61.22% return.

IBMQ

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -0.16%
• 6M: 0.41%
• YTD: 0.90%
• 1Y: 2.02%
• 3Y*: 2.88%
• 5Y*: 0.35%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 1.95%

TEMT

• 1D: -1.26%
• 1M: -49.43%
• 6M: -60.71%
• YTD: -61.22%
• 1Y: -64.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -73.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
IBMQ iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Muni Bond ETF	$1.97M	$1.98M	$1.89M
TEMT Tradr 2X Long TEM Daily ETF	$4.30M	$4.03M	$6.40M

IBMQ vs. TEMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IBMQ iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Muni Bond ETF	0.90%	3.44%
TEMT Tradr 2X Long TEM Daily ETF	-61.22%	-49.34%

Correlation

The correlation between IBMQ and TEMT is 0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2025	0.05

Return for Risk

IBMQ vs. TEMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IBMQ

IBMQ Risk / Return Rank: 72
IBMQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
IBMQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
IBMQ Omega Ratio Rank: 86
IBMQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
IBMQ Martin Ratio Rank: 47

TEMT

TEMT Risk / Return Rank: 5
TEMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
TEMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
TEMT Omega Ratio Rank: 7
TEMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
TEMT Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IBMQ vs. TEMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMQ) and Tradr 2X Long TEM Daily ETF (TEMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IBMQ	TEMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.95	-0.51	+2.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.84	-0.28	+3.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	0.97	+0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.09	-0.74	+2.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.46	-1.02	+6.48

IBMQ vs. TEMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBMQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is higher than the TEMT Sharpe Ratio of -0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBMQ and TEMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IBMQ vs. TEMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBMQ drawdown since its inception was -15.85%, smaller than the maximum TEMT drawdown of -89.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBMQ and TEMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	IBMQ	TEMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.85%	-89.82%	+73.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.13%	-89.82%	+88.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.64%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-11.45%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.25%	-88.66%	+88.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.19%	-53.22%	+50.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.43%	64.92%	-64.49%

Volatility

IBMQ vs. TEMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMQ) is 0.37%, while Tradr 2X Long TEM Daily ETF (TEMT) has a volatility of 38.17%. This indicates that IBMQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TEMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IBMQ	TEMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.37%	38.17%	-37.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.88%	97.91%	-97.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.22%	131.47%	-130.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.94%	136.82%	-133.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.49%	136.82%	-131.33%

IBMQ vs. TEMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBMQ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than TEMT's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

IBMQ vs. TEMT - Dividend Comparison

IBMQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, less than TEMT's 86.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
IBMQ iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Muni Bond ETF	2.24%	2.43%	2.33%	1.93%	1.25%	1.05%	1.24%	1.03%
TEMT Tradr 2X Long TEM Daily ETF	86.66%	33.60%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IBMQ and TEMT in my portfolio?

IBMQ and TEMT have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IBMQ or TEMT?

TEMT has higher volatility (38.17%) compared to IBMQ (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBMQ dropped -15.85% vs TEMT's -89.82%.

Which ETF is better, IBMQ or TEMT?

On 1-year performance, IBMQ leads with 2.02% vs -64.23% for TEMT. On fees, IBMQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IBMQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IBMQ or TEMT?

Over the 1-year period, IBMQ has performed better with a 2.02% return vs -64.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IBMQ or TEMT?

IBMQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for TEMT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IBMQ or TEMT?

TEMT has the higher dividend yield at 86.66%, compared with 2.24% for IBMQ.

What is the main difference between IBMQ and TEMT?

IBMQ is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while TEMT is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IBMQ and 1.30% for TEMT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBMQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.