SBIL vs. CTA
Compare and contrast key facts about Simplify Government Money Market ETF (SBIL) and Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA).
SBIL and CTA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SBIL is an actively managed fund by Simplify. It was launched on Jul 14, 2025. CTA is an actively managed fund by Simplify. It was launched on Mar 7, 2022.
Performance
SBIL vs. CTA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SBIL vs. CTA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SBIL Simplify Government Money Market ETF | 0.86% | 1.88% |
CTA Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 12.39% | 0.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBIL achieves a 0.86% return, which is significantly lower than CTA's 12.39% return.
SBIL
- 1D
- -0.00%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.86%
- 6M
- 1.85%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CTA
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- YTD
- 12.39%
- 6M
- 10.76%
- 1Y
- 6.40%
- 3Y*
- 15.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SBIL vs. CTA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SBIL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CTA's 0.78% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SBIL vs. CTA — Risk / Return Rank
SBIL
CTA
SBIL vs. CTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Government Money Market ETF (SBIL) and Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SBIL | CTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 14.25 | 0.69 | +13.57 |
Correlation
The correlation between SBIL and CTA is -0.00. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
SBIL vs. CTA - Dividend Comparison
SBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, less than CTA's 3.81% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBIL Simplify Government Money Market ETF | 2.68% | 1.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CTA Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 3.81% | 3.19% | 4.80% | 7.78% | 6.58% |
Drawdowns
SBIL vs. CTA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBIL drawdown since its inception was -0.03%, smaller than the maximum CTA drawdown of -18.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBIL and CTA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBIL | CTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -18.07% | +18.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.47% | +1.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -5.74% | +5.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.16% | — |
Volatility
SBIL vs. CTA - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SBIL | CTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.10% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.72% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28% | 16.05% | -15.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.28% | 15.58% | -15.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.28% | 15.58% | -15.30% |