SBHVX vs. WISGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Value Fund (SBHVX) and Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund (WISGX).
SBHVX is managed by Segall Bryant & Hamill. It was launched on Jul 31, 2013. WISGX is managed by Segall Bryant & Hamill. It was launched on Dec 20, 2013.
Performance
SBHVX vs. WISGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SBHVX vs. WISGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBHVX Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Value Fund | 5.47% | 12.27% | 12.31% | 11.97% | -14.66% | 16.61% | 6.22% | 24.65% | -4.54% | 10.92% |
WISGX Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund | 1.94% | 6.85% | 15.75% | 18.32% | -32.48% | 11.79% | 57.84% | 28.67% | 3.03% | 26.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBHVX achieves a 5.47% return, which is significantly higher than WISGX's 1.94% return. Over the past 10 years, SBHVX has underperformed WISGX with an annualized return of 9.58%, while WISGX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.10% annualized return.
SBHVX
- 1D
- 3.00%
- 1M
- -7.11%
- YTD
- 5.47%
- 6M
- 8.51%
- 1Y
- 28.99%
- 3Y*
- 13.65%
- 5Y*
- 4.96%
- 10Y*
- 9.58%
WISGX
- 1D
- 4.27%
- 1M
- -7.03%
- YTD
- 1.94%
- 6M
- 5.24%
- 1Y
- 22.43%
- 3Y*
- 11.46%
- 5Y*
- 1.46%
- 10Y*
- 13.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SBHVX vs. WISGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SBHVX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than WISGX's 0.87% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SBHVX vs. WISGX — Risk / Return Rank
SBHVX
WISGX
SBHVX vs. WISGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Value Fund (SBHVX) and Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund (WISGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SBHVX | WISGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.14 | 0.94 | +0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.73 | 1.44 | +0.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.19 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 1.52 | +0.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.37 | 5.85 | +0.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SBHVX | WISGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 0.94 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.06 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.55 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.44 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between SBHVX and WISGX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SBHVX vs. WISGX - Dividend Comparison
SBHVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.04%, while WISGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBHVX Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Value Fund | 11.04% | 11.65% | 4.61% | 1.37% | 1.25% | 4.66% | 0.95% | 6.05% | 10.28% | 6.78% | 0.22% | 5.76% |
WISGX Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 29.83% | 7.74% | 0.00% | 0.09% |
Drawdowns
SBHVX vs. WISGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBHVX drawdown since its inception was -41.54%, roughly equal to the maximum WISGX drawdown of -43.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBHVX and WISGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBHVX | WISGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.54% | -43.22% | +1.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.57% | -14.26% | -2.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.43% | -43.22% | +13.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.54% | -43.22% | +1.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.20% | -8.74% | -0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.34% | -12.69% | +5.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.58% | 3.69% | +0.89% |
Volatility
SBHVX vs. WISGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Value Fund (SBHVX) is 7.28%, while Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund (WISGX) has a volatility of 9.23%. This indicates that SBHVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WISGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SBHVX | WISGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.28% | 9.23% | -1.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.08% | 15.49% | -0.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.88% | 24.34% | +1.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.21% | 24.44% | -3.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.26% | 23.93% | -2.67% |