SBHVX vs. WTIBX
Compare and contrast key facts about Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Value Fund (SBHVX) and Segall Bryant & Hamill Plus Bond Fund (WTIBX).
SBHVX is managed by Segall Bryant & Hamill. It was launched on Jul 31, 2013. WTIBX is managed by Segall Bryant & Hamill. It was launched on Jun 1, 1988.
Performance
SBHVX vs. WTIBX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SBHVX vs. WTIBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBHVX Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Value Fund | 5.47% | 12.27% | 12.31% | 11.97% | -14.66% | 16.61% | 6.22% | 24.65% | -4.54% | 10.92% |
WTIBX Segall Bryant & Hamill Plus Bond Fund | -0.28% | 7.38% | 1.99% | 7.47% | -13.13% | -0.58% | 8.49% | 8.80% | -0.17% | 4.74% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBHVX achieves a 5.47% return, which is significantly higher than WTIBX's -0.28% return. Over the past 10 years, SBHVX has outperformed WTIBX with an annualized return of 9.58%, while WTIBX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.34% annualized return.
SBHVX
- 1D
- 3.00%
- 1M
- -7.11%
- YTD
- 5.47%
- 6M
- 8.51%
- 1Y
- 28.99%
- 3Y*
- 13.65%
- 5Y*
- 4.96%
- 10Y*
- 9.58%
WTIBX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -1.77%
- YTD
- -0.28%
- 6M
- 0.65%
- 1Y
- 4.09%
- 3Y*
- 4.24%
- 5Y*
- 0.80%
- 10Y*
- 2.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SBHVX vs. WTIBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SBHVX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than WTIBX's 0.55% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SBHVX vs. WTIBX — Risk / Return Rank
SBHVX
WTIBX
SBHVX vs. WTIBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Value Fund (SBHVX) and Segall Bryant & Hamill Plus Bond Fund (WTIBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SBHVX | WTIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.14 | 1.01 | +0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.73 | 1.42 | +0.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.18 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 1.51 | +0.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.37 | 4.81 | +1.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SBHVX | WTIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 1.01 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.14 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.50 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 1.03 | -0.63 |
Correlation
The correlation between SBHVX and WTIBX is -0.07. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
SBHVX vs. WTIBX - Dividend Comparison
SBHVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.04%, more than WTIBX's 3.82% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBHVX Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Value Fund | 11.04% | 11.65% | 4.61% | 1.37% | 1.25% | 4.66% | 0.95% | 6.05% | 10.28% | 6.78% | 0.22% | 5.76% |
WTIBX Segall Bryant & Hamill Plus Bond Fund | 3.82% | 4.11% | 4.04% | 3.66% | 3.23% | 3.08% | 3.95% | 3.95% | 3.55% | 3.50% | 3.43% | 3.55% |
Drawdowns
SBHVX vs. WTIBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBHVX drawdown since its inception was -41.54%, which is greater than WTIBX's maximum drawdown of -17.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBHVX and WTIBX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBHVX | WTIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.54% | -17.72% | -23.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.57% | -3.00% | -13.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.43% | -17.72% | -11.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.54% | -17.72% | -23.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.20% | -2.27% | -6.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.34% | -1.95% | -5.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.58% | 0.94% | +3.64% |
Volatility
SBHVX vs. WTIBX - Volatility Comparison
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Value Fund (SBHVX) has a higher volatility of 7.28% compared to Segall Bryant & Hamill Plus Bond Fund (WTIBX) at 1.61%. This indicates that SBHVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WTIBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SBHVX | WTIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.28% | 1.61% | +5.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.08% | 2.59% | +12.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.88% | 4.31% | +21.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.21% | 5.61% | +15.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.26% | 4.65% | +16.61% |