SBHVX vs. CSMDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Value Fund (SBHVX) and Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX).
SBHVX is managed by Segall Bryant & Hamill. It was launched on Jul 31, 2013. CSMDX is managed by Copeland Funds. It was launched on Feb 27, 2017.
Performance
SBHVX vs. CSMDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SBHVX vs. CSMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBHVX Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Value Fund | 5.47% | 12.27% | 12.31% | 11.97% | -14.66% | 16.61% | 6.22% | 24.65% | -4.54% | 9.19% |
CSMDX Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund | 3.93% | 2.72% | 2.24% | 18.89% | -14.89% | 22.60% | 8.29% | 29.90% | -5.20% | 10.44% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBHVX achieves a 5.47% return, which is significantly higher than CSMDX's 3.93% return.
SBHVX
- 1D
- 3.00%
- 1M
- -7.11%
- YTD
- 5.47%
- 6M
- 8.51%
- 1Y
- 28.99%
- 3Y*
- 13.65%
- 5Y*
- 4.96%
- 10Y*
- 9.58%
CSMDX
- 1D
- 2.39%
- 1M
- -7.03%
- YTD
- 3.93%
- 6M
- 4.38%
- 1Y
- 11.49%
- 3Y*
- 6.77%
- 5Y*
- 3.98%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SBHVX vs. CSMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SBHVX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than CSMDX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SBHVX vs. CSMDX — Risk / Return Rank
SBHVX
CSMDX
SBHVX vs. CSMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Value Fund (SBHVX) and Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SBHVX | CSMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.14 | 0.63 | +0.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.73 | 1.05 | +0.68 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.14 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 0.94 | +0.82 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.37 | 3.52 | +2.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SBHVX | CSMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 0.63 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.22 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.41 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between SBHVX and CSMDX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SBHVX vs. CSMDX - Dividend Comparison
SBHVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.04%, more than CSMDX's 3.02% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBHVX Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Value Fund | 11.04% | 11.65% | 4.61% | 1.37% | 1.25% | 4.66% | 0.95% | 6.05% | 10.28% | 6.78% | 0.22% | 5.76% |
CSMDX Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund | 3.02% | 3.14% | 1.33% | 0.81% | 4.07% | 6.67% | 0.38% | 2.61% | 4.40% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SBHVX vs. CSMDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBHVX drawdown since its inception was -41.54%, which is greater than CSMDX's maximum drawdown of -37.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBHVX and CSMDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBHVX | CSMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.54% | -37.28% | -4.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.57% | -13.33% | -3.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.43% | -24.60% | -4.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.20% | -7.03% | -2.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.34% | -5.84% | -1.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.58% | 3.55% | +1.03% |
Volatility
SBHVX vs. CSMDX - Volatility Comparison
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Value Fund (SBHVX) has a higher volatility of 7.28% compared to Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX) at 5.30%. This indicates that SBHVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SBHVX | CSMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.28% | 5.30% | +1.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.08% | 10.48% | +4.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.88% | 19.41% | +6.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.21% | 18.15% | +3.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.26% | 19.26% | +2.00% |