PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
SBFAX vs. WFSPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

SBFAX vs. WFSPX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SBFAX (1919 Financial Services Fund) and WFSPX (iShares S&P 500 Index Fund) are both mutual funds - SBFAX is a Financials Equities fund managed by BlackRock, while WFSPX is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, SBFAX returned 8.00%/yr vs 15.46%/yr for WFSPX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SBFAX charges 1.36%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for WFSPX.

Performance

SBFAX vs. WFSPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 1919 Financial Services Fund (SBFAX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBFAX achieves a -6.92% return, which is significantly lower than WFSPX's 10.87% return. Over the past 10 years, SBFAX has underperformed WFSPX with an annualized return of 8.00%, while WFSPX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.46% annualized return.

SBFAX

1D
-1.28%
1M
-3.45%
YTD
-6.92%
6M
-4.93%
1Y
-3.26%
3Y*
12.44%
5Y*
1.62%
10Y*
8.00%

WFSPX

1D
-0.74%
1M
4.17%
YTD
10.87%
6M
10.77%
1Y
27.97%
3Y*
22.41%
5Y*
13.88%
10Y*
15.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBFAX vs. WFSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SBFAX
1919 Financial Services Fund		-6.92%4.29%24.86%1.50%-13.99%30.74%0.14%29.11%-14.94%14.65%
WFSPX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund		10.87%17.83%24.94%26.25%-18.14%28.63%18.43%31.45%-4.83%21.27%

Correlation

The correlation between SBFAX and WFSPX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1999

0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between SBFAX and WFSPX has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

1919 Financial Services Fund

iShares S&P 500 Index Fund

Often compared with SBFAX:
SBFAX vs. ICFSXSBFAX vs. RYFIXSBFAX vs. HSFNXSBFAX vs. RMBKXSBFAX vs. FLCSBFAX vs. BTOSBFAX vs. FSRBX
Often compared with WFSPX:
WFSPX vs. JLGMXWFSPX vs. VOOWFSPX vs. FSPGXWFSPX vs. FXAIXWFSPX vs. BRMKXWFSPX vs. IVVWFSPX vs. APGYX

Return for Risk

SBFAX vs. WFSPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
SBFAX
SBFAX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
SBFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
SBFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
WFSPX
WFSPX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
WFSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
WFSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBFAX vs. WFSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 1919 Financial Services Fund (SBFAX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

SBFAXWFSPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-0.29
2.37

-2.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
-0.30
3.24

-3.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.43

-0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.37

3.16

-3.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.86

14.75

-15.61

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SBFAX vs. WFSPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBFAX Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the WFSPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBFAX and WFSPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

SBFAXWFSPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.29

2.37

-2.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

0.83

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.86

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.13

+0.26

Drawdowns

SBFAX vs. WFSPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBFAX drawdown since its inception was -49.33%, smaller than the maximum WFSPX drawdown of -58.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBFAX and WFSPX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

SBFAXWFSPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.33%

-58.21%

+8.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.03%

-8.90%

-2.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.41%

-18.74%

+2.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.94%

-24.51%

-9.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.58%

-33.74%

-9.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.74%

-0.74%

-9.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.52%

-12.77%

+3.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.76%

1.90%

+2.86%

Volatility

SBFAX vs. WFSPX - Volatility Comparison

1919 Financial Services Fund (SBFAX) has a higher volatility of 3.58% compared to iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX) at 2.92%. This indicates that SBFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WFSPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

SBFAXWFSPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.58%

2.92%

+0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.18%

8.99%

+1.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.24%

11.88%

+2.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.34%

16.88%

+2.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.82%

18.02%

+4.80%

SBFAX vs. WFSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBFAX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is higher than WFSPX's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

SBFAX vs. WFSPX - Dividend Comparison

SBFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.59%, more than WFSPX's 1.58% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SBFAX
1919 Financial Services Fund		15.59%14.51%10.60%10.93%2.40%4.83%5.09%3.84%1.58%0.00%2.93%7.25%
WFSPX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund		1.58%1.72%1.41%1.50%2.02%1.82%1.66%1.99%2.00%1.62%2.37%2.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

SBFAX and WFSPX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SBFAX has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to WFSPX (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBFAX dropped -49.33% vs WFSPX's -58.21%.

WFSPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBFAX and WFSPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer