SBFAX vs. FAFDX
Compare and contrast key facts about 1919 Financial Services Fund (SBFAX) and Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class A (FAFDX).
SBFAX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Nov 16, 1998. FAFDX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Sep 3, 1996.
Performance
SBFAX vs. FAFDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SBFAX vs. FAFDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBFAX 1919 Financial Services Fund | -6.51% | 4.29% | 24.86% | 1.50% | -13.99% | 30.74% | 0.14% | 29.11% | -14.94% | 14.65% |
FAFDX Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class A | -7.33% | 14.91% | 39.01% | 14.03% | -8.93% | 32.90% | -0.25% | 33.77% | -16.09% | 20.17% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBFAX achieves a -6.51% return, which is significantly higher than FAFDX's -7.33% return. Over the past 10 years, SBFAX has underperformed FAFDX with an annualized return of 8.60%, while FAFDX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.97% annualized return.
SBFAX
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- -3.96%
- YTD
- -6.51%
- 6M
- -5.56%
- 1Y
- -3.79%
- 3Y*
- 11.91%
- 5Y*
- 2.95%
- 10Y*
- 8.60%
FAFDX
- 1D
- 2.35%
- 1M
- -3.91%
- YTD
- -7.33%
- 6M
- -2.63%
- 1Y
- 6.82%
- 3Y*
- 21.52%
- 5Y*
- 11.28%
- 10Y*
- 12.97%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SBFAX vs. FAFDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SBFAX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is higher than FAFDX's 1.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SBFAX vs. FAFDX — Risk / Return Rank
SBFAX
FAFDX
SBFAX vs. FAFDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 1919 Financial Services Fund (SBFAX) and Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class A (FAFDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SBFAX | FAFDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | 0.32 | -0.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | 0.57 | -0.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.08 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.26 | 0.54 | -0.80 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.68 | 1.66 | -2.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SBFAX | FAFDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 | 0.32 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.54 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | 0.55 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.30 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between SBFAX and FAFDX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SBFAX vs. FAFDX - Dividend Comparison
SBFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.52%, more than FAFDX's 7.48% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBFAX 1919 Financial Services Fund | 15.52% | 14.51% | 10.60% | 10.93% | 2.40% | 4.83% | 5.09% | 3.84% | 1.58% | 0.00% | 2.93% | 7.25% |
FAFDX Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class A | 7.48% | 6.93% | 9.59% | 2.29% | 5.93% | 4.21% | 2.47% | 1.21% | 4.00% | 0.06% | 0.21% | 0.53% |
Drawdowns
SBFAX vs. FAFDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBFAX drawdown since its inception was -49.33%, smaller than the maximum FAFDX drawdown of -75.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBFAX and FAFDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBFAX | FAFDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.33% | -75.69% | +26.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.95% | -14.39% | +2.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.94% | -25.14% | -8.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.58% | -45.99% | +2.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.34% | -10.13% | +0.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.53% | -17.73% | +8.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.57% | 4.68% | -0.11% |
Volatility
SBFAX vs. FAFDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for 1919 Financial Services Fund (SBFAX) is 4.12%, while Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class A (FAFDX) has a volatility of 5.11%. This indicates that SBFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAFDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SBFAX | FAFDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.12% | 5.11% | -0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.04% | 12.63% | -1.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.20% | 21.21% | -3.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.43% | 21.14% | -1.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.85% | 23.84% | -0.99% |