FAFDX vs. EPGAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class A (FAFDX) and Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class A (EPGAX).
FAFDX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Sep 3, 1996. EPGAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 3, 1996.
Performance
FAFDX vs. EPGAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FAFDX vs. EPGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAFDX Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class A | -9.46% | 14.91% | 39.01% | 14.03% | -8.93% | 32.90% | -0.25% | 33.77% | -16.09% | 20.17% |
EPGAX Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class A | -9.37% | 14.27% | 15.57% | 35.25% | -24.67% | 22.66% | 43.38% | 33.69% | -0.04% | 34.83% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FAFDX having a -9.46% return and EPGAX slightly higher at -9.37%. Over the past 10 years, FAFDX has underperformed EPGAX with an annualized return of 12.71%, while EPGAX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.92% annualized return.
FAFDX
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- -5.39%
- YTD
- -9.46%
- 6M
- -5.99%
- 1Y
- 4.37%
- 3Y*
- 20.58%
- 5Y*
- 11.02%
- 10Y*
- 12.71%
EPGAX
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- -9.04%
- YTD
- -9.37%
- 6M
- -8.73%
- 1Y
- 13.01%
- 3Y*
- 13.72%
- 5Y*
- 7.77%
- 10Y*
- 14.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FAFDX vs. EPGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAFDX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than EPGAX's 0.97% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FAFDX vs. EPGAX — Risk / Return Rank
FAFDX
EPGAX
FAFDX vs. EPGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class A (FAFDX) and Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class A (EPGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAFDX | EPGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.25 | 0.60 | -0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.47 | 0.99 | -0.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.14 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.22 | 0.79 | -0.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.68 | 2.81 | -2.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAFDX | EPGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 | 0.60 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.38 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.72 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.48 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between FAFDX and EPGAX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FAFDX vs. EPGAX - Dividend Comparison
FAFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.66%, more than EPGAX's 0.68% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAFDX Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class A | 7.66% | 6.93% | 9.59% | 2.29% | 5.93% | 4.21% | 2.47% | 1.21% | 4.00% | 0.06% | 0.21% | 0.53% |
EPGAX Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class A | 0.68% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.56% | 2.26% | 12.86% | 12.06% | 9.56% | 7.10% | 12.35% | 6.39% | 2.37% |
Drawdowns
FAFDX vs. EPGAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAFDX drawdown since its inception was -75.69%, which is greater than EPGAX's maximum drawdown of -63.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAFDX and EPGAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAFDX | EPGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.69% | -63.20% | -12.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.39% | -12.80% | -1.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.14% | -30.60% | +5.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.99% | -31.17% | -14.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.19% | -12.67% | +0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.73% | -16.32% | -1.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.64% | 3.62% | +1.02% |
Volatility
FAFDX vs. EPGAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class A (FAFDX) is 4.51%, while Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class A (EPGAX) has a volatility of 6.26%. This indicates that FAFDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EPGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FAFDX | EPGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.51% | 6.26% | -1.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.41% | 12.65% | -0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.13% | 21.50% | -0.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.12% | 20.67% | +0.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.83% | 20.73% | +3.10% |